Like put yourself in the investors shoes, you have CDPR heads telling you

This campaign funding / lobbying aspect of U.S. politics has always baffled me here from overseas, and looks downright sleazy... also, when will media companies realize that snippets of their works in creative pop cultural content from people having fun on social media probably is better marketing for them than…

It’s not difficult to see why Tillis would push a proposal that benefits big companies in the entertainment industry to the detriment of regular people; The American Prospect points out that in the past couple years, Tillis’ campaign committee and leadership received donations totaling out to well over $100,000…

I’ll be honest. I love a lot of Destiny, but stopped playing when it seemed like they kept recycling the same old shit, and all my old shit started becoming useless. After maybe six months not playing the game, I came back and never felt like I could keep up with the meta.

Here’s a crazy idea:

Let your developers work at a reasonable pace and set your release windows to actual, realistic time-lines in the first place and then you don’t have to push shit back a million times because your project managers can’t seem to figure out how time works. Tell marketing to shut the fuck up and not…

He looks like 10 years younger now, which doesn’t really fit with where Peter is in his life in the game’s story.

I’m not gonna pass judgement until I see new Peter emote. The old face, while a little bug-eyed and “unrealistic” according to some people, was pretty damn emotive, especially during his more emotional scenes.

I hate being negative on the Internet, but... yeah, I’m kinda with you on this one. It definitely has that Avengers problem, where the only characters that look good are the ones that either don’t look like their movie counterparts at all (Ant-Man) or just aren’t in the movies (Ms. Marvel).

I really liked this version of Peter as an experienced, late career Spider-Man. This makes him look too young.

It’s so boring and plain, WHY? Just WHY??? 

Thanks, I hate it.

I fully understand why it’s being removed, but I will continue to be critical of a company that painted themselves into this corner where removal of a not insignificant chunk of content is the best option, as well as critical of any that laughably try and pretend this is anything except a least bad option among bad…

Adding yet another layer of corporate bureaucracy to the mix. Because that’s always makes things better.

Lol $70 for a remaster. What a joke.

I wouldn’t mind the ten dollars if, y’know, there was a game developers union.

great, I will not be buying them until they come down in price. Ive seen the whole “production costs have gone up” bs excuse long enough now. yes production has gone up, but profits have gone up even more. the game industry’s audience now dwarfs what it was in the 90's or even the early 2000's. there is zero reason to…

Does that count for a remaster of an old game?

Unfortunately, some of those games will be $70 😱

In fairness, in the original Super Mario All-Stars all four of the games were 1) on the same console and 2) released over the course of three years (1985-1988). Compare that to these three games released across three consoles over 11 years (1996-2007). Also, the amount of material on four NES Mario games (and remember…

The seasonal model is exhausting and I hate it. But I’m guessing it won’t be going away anytime soon, if at all.