Sounds like you need new players.

Nice. We had one LGBTQ member of our gaming group back in high school, and it was about the only place he felt welcomed - almost everyone in the group was an outcast of some sort, and we all bonded over that and the game. He was killed in a car accident my third year of college. I wish he was still around to see this…

This.

Because D&D has had marginalized groups in its DNA since the very beginning?

This seems more to just be about having gay nonplayer characters in the official campaigns, not encouraging players to make their characters gay. That said, a DM can make the NPCs whatever they want, regardless of what they are in the campaign by default.

To ruin the world for all of the assholes who see people enjoying the freedom to live their lives in peace and ask ,”But Why?”

I suppose this is talking more about the pre-designed adventure paths and not home-brewed campaigns but I’ve always found D&D (and table top games as a whole) to actually be very LGBTQ positive and accepting. If I remember correctly, the player handbook (back before the 5th ed mentioned here :) ) specifically mentions…

Before anyone starts bitching about SJWs and movements for inclusivity hurting their pretendy-funtimes without remembering that, ultimately, DnD is a game based around cooperation:

Why the hate? That group looking for the ark included some very nice people.

Oh sure, mock us with a well groomed and sane Prime Minister.

Well, a gurl can dream, right?

Because they think consent is fake news.

Whenever people equate pedophilia with homosexuality I can’t help but scream that they clearly don’t understand the concept of CONSENT.

“Seriously, does this mean we’ll be allowed to marry horses? This is important for someone who is not me.”

Lately it seems that the folks most likely to reference the Constitution have no idea what’s in it.

They’re still using this tired ass argument? I mean he might as well said “what’s next men marrying dogs/horses?”

LGBT behavior is a choice they make,

“So we’re being asked to provide Constitutional protections for behavior, a choice in behavior as opposed to a primary characteristic.”

Why can’t these dumbfucks learn the difference between stuff that goes on between consenting adults and an adult—usually a straight man—raping a child?