I’d kill for a Starion/Conquest in nice shape. I’d pay good cash for one.
However, 11,500 is a bridge too far for a yellow one with a suspected bonehead owner who seems to ‘know what he has’.
I’d kill for a Starion/Conquest in nice shape. I’d pay good cash for one.
However, 11,500 is a bridge too far for a yellow one with a suspected bonehead owner who seems to ‘know what he has’.
I guess I’ll be the first to say - I like it. 100000x better than anything else GM has come up with lately.
The non-Z71 versions are fine. Better than the Silverado and Sierra by far. No lines that don’t match, no silliness.
But the Z71. JEEEESUS. WTF.
Still seems like anecdotal evidence. I think I’m going to need more.
How do you know, though?
I’m not saying it isn’t, I’m just saying all things being equal if you’re trying to get museum-quality money, the museum-quality car should be bought first rather than the high-mile resto job.
I like you. We should be friends.
You should go back and read the joke again.
It’s your money, do what you want, I guess. But I guess I just can’t wrap my mind around throwing that kind of money away on a depreciating asset, especially considering you can get a nicely equipped used truck that does the exact same job for a tenth of the price. We’ve long reached the diminishing returns tipping…
There lies a special seat in hell for civvies who drive repurposed police cruisers. Come on down.
The difference is that the ones you linked are all low-mileage survivors. The ad here is for a high-mile car with a refreshed paint job. That car should never bring more money than a clean, low-mile, well kept survivor.
A deeply conflicted CP for me. Gorgeous car. An icon of its time. Manual. Clean as a whistle. A wonderful example of an SHO, which are near impossible to find anymore.
That said, 132,000 miles and 7 grand.... I’d be NP’ing this all day if it was a 32,000 mile car, but that’s high miles regardless of age, and you don’t…
Huts? Sounds like a way for general contractors to make more money, then we can just add features like walls, heat, running water, etc. But that hut will be cheap. Waaaaaait a minute......................................
I mean, it’s literally his last name...
Ford’s communications manager will keep bragging about the F-150’s stratospheric average transaction prices on Twitter
“A Chevrolet truck will run like shit twice as long as any other truck will run at all”.
Pretty obvious that he didn’t see him much, if at all, so the legend stays true.
I’m aware I’m thinking with my heart, for sure. I just try to think back on when Nissan was ‘good’ and why we were interested back then, and I think it was the excitement/value angle. We could have bought any old sedan, but the Maxima was blistering fast and handled far better vs its competition. We could have bought…
Neutral: Honestly? Performance models. Get people talking. Get people excited. Bring back what made them a marque worth considering. Nissan sits on a pile of exciting nameplates that have resonance with buyers. Start on the R36. Refresh the Z car. Bring back a good Sentra SE-R. Remind themselves what ‘4DSC’ means.…