No one takes the time to investigate anymore. Rumor is reported as fact.

I'll help: the first amendment doesn't protect anyone's right to film people having sex and show it to millions.

Publishing sex tapes isn't Journalism. If you became famous would you not sue a publication that filmed you having sex and showed it to millions of people?

Hulk Hogan was a victim. Peter Theil was a victim. I don't see you doing anything but blaming them. I don't care what you did no one should be outed or filmed having sex. Period. If you wouldn't like it if someone did it to you why would you expect anyone else to stand for it? And please tell us why Gawker refused to…

It's the story of a big business coming in and taking over a family business. That business just happens to be crime.

I feel like an opening flashback showing the corvette/stamp trade when they were kids would have helped a lot.

I don't know you could apply "dumb shit" to every season if you really wanted to. Why keep recordings of all your wrongdoings Malvo? Why did Mike Milligan shoot up the Gerhardts estate just to kill an old man instead of the mother and the granddaughter? Would Lester really be able to start his own insurance business…

If a newspaper publishes a stolen sex tape of Donald Trump I'm not going to root for that newspaper no matter how much i hate Trump. Maybe if Gawker didn't do something both blatantly illegal AND immoral they'd still be around.

What precedent did Gawker set besides "don't film people having sex without their knowledge and publish it for millions to see you goddamn dumbasses"?

Thank you. I wish people would stop acting like Ken Bones favorite porn sites is real news that everyone needs to know.

I'll say it again: I'm comfortable with any publication that thinks stolen sex tapes are real news going under. I hope there's a website right now looking at a stolen sex tape and going "maybe the clicks we'll get from this isn't worth winding up like Gawker"

There's nothing chilling about "maybe we shouldn't publish this stolen sex tape." If you think that's real news i don't know what to tell you. Is Ken Bones browser history real news? Frankly i think the New York Times should be punished for publishing a private citizens hacked information because Fucking WHY?

They then went on to talk about his racism in a desperate attempt to make us not sympathize with a victim of a crime.

Sorry i misspoke; i meant the democrats emails our current president asked Russia to hack.

Any publication that Defends its right to publish stolen sex tapes deserves to go under. Golden rule folks: if you wouldn't like it if someone secretly recorded you having sex and published it to millions, then why do it to someone else? Because he's a celebrity? Christ who would ever want to be famous?

Personal opinion but i think hacking and leaks are only okay to expose illegal activity that someone powerful is committing.

It's okay. Sarcasm is dead. The host of The Apprentice is president.

I can only speak for California and the only problem i have is more people use uber. Sometimes you have to go to certain areas in order to find someone who uses Lyft. With uber everyone is using it everywhere. It's why I'm trying to get more people to use it.

I apologize for not being sarcastic enough with my previous comment

I'm okay setting a precedent that you shouldn't publish someone's stolen sex tape.