You can plug it into a PC and use it as a PC headset, and it’s one of the best PC VR headsets despite having more capabilities and being half the price as its competition.
You can plug it into a PC and use it as a PC headset, and it’s one of the best PC VR headsets despite having more capabilities and being half the price as its competition.
“Battlefield has always been weird and silly”
Making people “powerless to impede” your policy ideas sure sounds a lot like communism or perhaps dictatorship, but I wish you and the other two dozen people who are unironically on board with this idea the best of luck with that.
Also I don’t give a flying fuck what the right wing nuts jobs think
I’m guessing you live in a 500sqft apartment and make 40k a year with no kids. Grow up. Banning mansions, setting aside a minute that its a incredibly stupid idea, is just showing the right wing nutcases that the left wing really does want to control all aspects of their life. Whats next? Banning land ownership over 1…
This doesn’t surprise me. As a bisexual man, I don’t expect Disney to do much for LGBT representation. It’s nice when they do, but I’m not going to ask for duck l’orange at Arby’s.
The reason they’re calling it Boba Fett’s ship with Lego is because kids aren’t going to know the name. Its been used a couple of times in The Clone Wars but outside of that its never been named. So its easier on parents who don’t know what a Slave-1 is to look for Boba Fett’s ship. Honestly doing it like that for…
You are more than welcome to go back to your basement.
Just want to say, I found all your posts to be very informative.
People have been predicting the demise of fracking for the last decade. Production keeps growing and fewer and fewer offshore wells get drilled. That WSJ article is from 2019, and shale production actually kept growing after it was written. Only thing that shut it down was COVID.
The offshore leases are auctioned, and right now almost no company wants them at any price (see also ANWR). The drilling itself is too risky and expensive. Republicans tend to think the year is 1958 and were totally divorced from the current reality of the industry.
Not sure I follow. If federal leases were so cheap relative to “future value”, then every company would drill on federal land exclusively. But the majority of production in the U.S. is on private land. What value an asset may have in the future is speculative. That’s like saying Google was the beneficiary of subsidies…
You’ve supplied more detail than the original article. But who are you really talking about? U.S. oil companies or some other entity?
I’m pro-EV, but I’m surprised nobody has bothered to call out the author on the hand waiving regarding what constitutes a fossil fuel “subsidy.” Make no mistake, the federal government is not writing checks to the oil industry, nor are there much in the way of tax breaks that aren’t available to non-oil companies.
This article is merely a continuation of partisan communication. I have yet to see EV or anti oil advocates address impending lithium and cobalt shortages, the associated environmental effects or the infrastructure issues surrounding light rail.
It’s absolutely right that the economics have to make sense before there will be a transition to renewable energy. In fact, it would have been nearly impossible do otherwise. What would have happened if Shell had announced a big new investment in electric car charging in 1990? If they had decided to transition away…
So, overall, I would say that Elliot Page is saying that saying him or them doesn’t cause him distress
there’s a really simple explanation and these scientists are digging way deeper than they need to. it’s because alot of us grew up playing Goldeneye on the N64 which had the Y-axis inverted by default.
and Erin Kellyman (Solo)
Unless you’re dismayed that you missed an investment opportunity for the long term, please just shut the fuck up.