Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

Simple dummy, there is no clause that has the words AUTHORIZATION OF APPROPRIATIONS in it. So i’m going to fruitlessly remind you that they successfully put in 81 other appropriations that detail who gets paid and where the money comes from to make it clear. This is vague, and could possibly refer to one of the other…

What are you smoking now? That cost hating is some tough stuff.

I proved you wrong at least a dozen times. Why are you still harping about something that is n0t even in the bill. According to your limited mental capacity, I bet you think the ACA covers my car insurance too. They SHALL PAY my monthly car bills. Since we have no idea or details on what those payments are or who the…

I showed you what an appropriation looks like. Clearly they know how to write an appropriation because there are 81 different ones in the ACA. Section 1402 is not an appropriation, it does not define anything really. Keep harping on some vague language that does in no way apply to anything in this discussion. yawn.…

There you go again with the language. You are wrong, just admit it and move on. Why are you such a zealot? Admit your mistakes and move on.

We covered all of this. You are either too stubborn or too stupid to understand. I am tired of you. Your language is unacceptable and a clear sign that you have no facts what so ever to support your statements.

No, there is no appropriations in the bill for cost reduction subsides, nor is there any description of the payments. Its an open and shut case. It absolutely does not say YOU SHALL MAKE THE PAYMENTS. You are acting like one seriously thick headed troll. I laid it all out for you more clearly than anyone ever should.…

Now you are just being stubborn. That is in no way an appropriations for anything and you know it. There is no time frame, no amount, and no scope.

No, the president was never authorized to spend. There was no appropriation. It talks about the subsidies but it never actually creates them or instructs the president to make them. If the payments were never authorized or appropriated then they don’t exist.

Not really continuing to argue here, but with more in depth reading of the situation it appears that your arguments have some very valid points. Here is the kicker though and the reason the house won. The ACA fails to appropriate the funds for the Cost Sharing Reductions. This is either a mistake by the drafters, or…

how about a sign that says 24x7 video surveillance up there?

I guess its all in your interpretation. Weird stuff happens down there.

You mean a lot MORE. lol Tell them to come on up. We have power and air conditioning.

We should be doing more to help American Citizens transition from the lost cause that is Puerto Rico to the other 50 states. There are plenty of places they could move, so it would be nice to see states other than New York getting ready for a flood of people.

Now that I know you understand the laws and how the constitution was written, I don’t see any point in going further. If you don’t like the outcome that’s just your opinion. I was merely laying out the law and how it applies.