Again....

Actually measured by deat per 100,000 participant....

Let it lso be noted that when the schools, via their NCAA cartel, tried to enter into agreements designed to limit what could be offered to assistant coaches, the coaches sued on antitrust grounds in federal court, and had the agreements ruled illegal, in about 5 minutes. To propose that the coaches rightly receive…

The auctioning of broadcast rights to those games makes it commerce, and it is contemptibly dishonest of you to try to put that ridiculous argument forth.

If Father Jenkins would have said.......

That’s right, dummy. Sources who are unnamed are unnamed. How do you feed yourself?

Hey, idiot? An unnamed source, even 90 of them, is not proof of a fabricated source. Again, are you really this dumb?

Are you really this stupid? Nobody claimed that any source had no axe to grind. The only claim being made is that an ex Patriots coach and employee said they witnessed something. Yes, it is possible they are lying. Yes, it is possible that Van Natta completely fabricated a source. The point is to make a judgement on…

Are you really so goddamned stupid as to think that such a discrepancy means it is reasonable to think that Van Natta completely fabricated a source? You’re really that stupid?

Yeah, sure, that discrepanacy means that it is reasonable to think that Van Natta completely fabricated a source. Good grief.

I didn’t say you should grant 100% credibility. There isn’t a track record of Van Natta completly fabricating sources, however, so you shouldn’t dismiss it, either..

Can we please ask that every citizen of this country be subject to antitrust laws?

I’d give my pinky finger to have all people who participate in illegal price fixing cartels jailed. I mean, who wouldn’t give the smallest of digits to see Brian Kelly in and Father Jenkins in prison?

Do you undertand that there is no exception in antitrust law, for taking some of the profits earned as a result entering into illegal collusive agreements (already established in the O’Bannon case) with other cartel members, and spending them on things that don’t make money?

How large a illegal price fixing cartel (already established in the O’Bannon case) are you willing to tolerate, before you withdraw your support?

He’s being dishonest, because Notre Dame is competing with other schools to auction broadcast rights for athletic performaces to the highest bidder, whie colluding with other schoold to limit what is offered athletes. He’s as big a criminal as any other price fixing shitbag.

The should pay them because right now they are participating in a conspiracy to violate antitrust laws, by meeting under the umbrella of the NCAA, with other schools, and entering into an agreement to limit what is offered athletes, despite the absence of a CBA explicitly permitting such collusion.

Jenkins is a criminal, who has entered into a conspiracy, with the people who run the other schools which compete with Notre Dame to auction broadcast rights to athletic perforamances, usually in small cartels called conferences. The conspiracy Jenkins and the other schools participate it takes place under the…

I don’t think you know what “evidence” means. It is not a synonym for “100% unimpeachable proof”. When Mark Felt told Woodward stuff, and Woodward published it, as being from an unnamed sourse, it was evidence. Is it evidence that woud be adequate in a criminal or civil legal setting? Of course not, but that isn’t the…

Lemme get this straight. Because Van Natta used an unqualified “all the owners” in a podcast, wanting the evidence destroyed, and then indicated months later in a radio interview that “owners” were mad about how the evidence was handled, in refrerence to 32 individuals, it is proof that Van Natta may have compltely…