@TomXP411: I'm just pointing out that there are a lot of products that we buy and use every day that aren't as great as we'd like them to be, or as great as their manufacturer's tout them.

It's almost as though these people think they have a constitutional right to a quality phone...

@nootron: That's l'esprit d'escalier :)

Err - really? We are really trying to read Courier hope into that one-liner?

@dennis636223: To answer your question directly - why would anyone say that about the original iPhone? The original iPhone could not support 3G. Thus my point regarding the new iPhone and your earlier statement.

@dennis636223: The part I was confused about was your semantics "Nothing spells 4g like a network that already has it." - you write (awkwardly) as though there is something inherent in the iPhone 4G that should be on a 4G network.

@dennis636223: "Nothing spells 4g like a network that already has it."

@AreWeThereYeti: Plus, he should calm the hell down - the UK was one of the last hold outs and only metrified relatively recently.

@Chernobyl: I will admit - I do have two assholes as a result of my cable company.

@Chernobyl: I actually agree with him, even if he was exaggerating. I have premium cable - if I want to watch something with ads - I will DVR it.

It's not cutesy - it's a J. The intended smiley would have been cutesy.

@bozack: We did! :)

These look clear - doesn't light degrade wine over time?

@NotSure2010: "at least" 380 feet deep - there is no way to know the potential depth, only the minimum based on lack of reflected light.

@Nintendo3ds: Hurley?

@nach0: That made me smile, thanks!

@Damn the Fanboys: nice :)

@Jux: I happen to agree with you, but...

So, your justification for being incredibly (and unnecessarily) rude is:

@im2fools: Yeah, I bet Charlie is a bit oily considering he's a sex addict.