And agreed he’s a total bullshit operator of the highest form.

I have vague memories of older relatives using the phrase “cream puff” in this way when I was a kid.

Pudendecorating?

My point was that the use of vagina to mean vulva has reached the point where an entire generation of women who, I am sure, think they know a lot about their bodies, don’t even know the correct names for the various parts of their genitals. I will not stop pointing out that vulvas are vulvas, not vaginas, so long as…

Yes. I want to link to the pilot episode of Modern Family, but instead of video, ABC provided a written summary.

FFS, he just wrote these in February, but we’re supposed to believe he’s had a profound awakening now that he has a federal job?!

Right? I understand that the average person may not know what an attorney general does, but does HE even know? And agreed he’s a total bullshit operator of the highest form.

Is “creampuff” intended to be a homophobic slur? Seems like there’s some implication in there that he’s not a “real” man, but some kind of feminized version of a man.

Wouldn’t he have been a public servant in his position as Attorney General of the Chiricahua Apache?

I thought vajazzling was like, so 3 years ago or something. But what do I know, I’m Old.

Monscaping?

I will never surrender. The last time I commented on this issue, pretty much every single response was, “I had no idea it’s called a vulva. I thought the whole thing up to my belly button is called a vagina.” I rest my case.

“Anyway, let’s look at some porn together”

Bush-dazzling?
Or does that just make it seem like you’re decorating the ex-President?

And the ‘water’ emoji which everyone uses for semen.

That photo made my vagina sympathy ache for her.

I’m a huge proponent of vajazzling. Nowadays, if I’m presented with a vagina that can’t scratch glass, I send it away. 

I don’t know about “vajazzled” but all I see in that photo is a future, raging UTI. #sandisnotyourfriend

Those are . . . those are real tweets? An at least semi-respected publication with decades of print history actually used “vajazzled”?

We have a dearth of people who can think critically about literally anything here in the U.S., let alone people who can think critically about legal matters.