And you kept repeating that lie, time after time.

I feel like the perfect compromise here is New Noise by Refused, mostly because the rest of my pre-game playlist was Anti Flag, Rage Against The Machine and Enter Shikari, which I'm definitely not winning credibility with.

Unless Boris Johnson is Prime Minister at the same time. I think that's probably some sort of singularity that would destroy the very concept of satire and possibly the fabric of reality.

I really liked the decision to painstakingly recreate the bar night, and I feel a lot of the better high concept Nathan For You episodes (And by better I mean the best, and just so unlike anything else out there) do an exceptional job of blurring reality/narrative, whilst working within a premise that is based in the…

He does have it win/win there, if they like it, it seems like validation for the character to move forward and if they don't we get an incongruous voice-over where what he's describing has no bearing on reality. I.E "They were thrilled" *cuts to shot of a disinterested business owner*. It's a testament to his world…

"His name's Bison…this guy walks through the raindrops" There's also Chris Klein making an argument for Nicholas Cage being a great actor by absolutely failing at trying to act like Nicholas Cage in a bad film.

That was a really hard episode to watch and evaluate, mostly because, as someone who comes from a Northern working class background these kind of portrayals and the implications/class politics they evoke just make me, at best uncomfortable, at worst angry. It's not that I'm saying you can't have stereotypes, or that…

I do buy that his character would have affectations, but I hardly think it counts as a discrepancy, it's possible to naturally develop a different accent to your environment.

A pull? No, if you're going to bounce me like this I'd much rather hook you in the air over a third man.

One can never be too careful, just one feathered edge of a moving ball and you'll be caught behind. And you have to be very watchful if the bowler is swinging it both ways.

This is basically how I felt watching Homer At The Bat as a child that had absolutely no clue what Baseball was.

It consists entirely of one man, Geoffrey Boycott. That's it.

"In some countries the carnal pleasures of porcine creatures is a prerequisite to taking office"-David Cameron

With it devolving into some insane loop of the gang suggesting something and Nathan going along with it, until either he breaks, or they break society, I'm ok with either.

Now I want to see a crossover episode in which Nathan Fielder tries to save Paddy's Pub.

Was anyone else a little concerned by some of the parenting in this episode. Can I measure and take photos of your child? Sure. Would you like to sign a weird contract regarding a sponsorship deal with your child without having any legal advice? Sure. Will you let your child sit down with an overweight bearded man…

The only purpose I can think for that is, if you want to convince the other person you're drinking. a la how Nathan used it. Which sort of feels 1 logical step away from a Dennis Reynolds idea, or at the very least it's an idea with a creepy implication.

This is an amazing start, much appreciated.

I'm absolutely open to suggestions, I don't even really have a guideline, other than can be played whilst cooking. Which probably doesn't exclude anything other than the graphic descriptions of E-Coli podcasts.

I haven't seen the cameo, but it can't be anywhere near the high level of avant garde performance art that Simms produces every week trying to describe events that we can already see unfolding correctly. (For those who don't watch American Football, the tao of Simms in all it's glory https://twitter.com/philsim….