I probably would’ve disappeared too. They had enough evidence to convict him without her testimony; that she took a settlement from him shouldn’t’ve made any difference to the evidence gathered. The person to be mad at is Hardy, not Holder.
I probably would’ve disappeared too. They had enough evidence to convict him without her testimony; that she took a settlement from him shouldn’t’ve made any difference to the evidence gathered. The person to be mad at is Hardy, not Holder.
It’s from the “Itchy and Scratchy and Poochie Show.” The full quote is: “(angrily) Oh, no attitude, eh? Not in your face, huh? Well, you can cram it with walnuts, ugly!”
Actually, it’s not that she’s lost her humanity; it’s that she believes people’s actions are based on their choices and their choices alone. The daughter has culpability in her own death. Was Amazon wrong for selling her a banned substance? Yes. However, Amazon’s doesn’t really have any, even though they sold her the…