whyysooseriouss
YellowFootIsADummy
whyysooseriouss

All of the people who kept questioning my side eye at Johnny Depp during this trial and my suspicion that he was working with internet platforms to discredit Heard this will be the first of many examples that he was doing just that.

If Kotaku can zombie on indefinitely after losing pretty much everyone, giantbomb will probably do the same.

None of this is new. It was well known at the time of confirmation that she was in an arranged marriage set up by her cult. Dig around a little. Read how submissive she is required to be and ask who - exactly - is making legal decisions in that family. Hint: as ugly as she is inside, it’s the hubs. 

Catholics staying on brand. 

I’d say the real world is not Jezebel. Or more exactly, Jezebel is not the real world. “Democrat” is a pretty wide label. You can range pretty far afield and still be a Democrat if you consider yourself one. There was one Republican Senator I decided to vote for every time he ran for reelection because although I

“Evil” is one of the best, most original shows I’ve seen in a LONG time; they have some-13-movie deal with South Park; they’re bringing back Beavis and Butthead WITH the original music videos (granted this kind of a conflicts with your point) ; Paramount+ is far more relevant than MTV.

Well this is the individual who really thought her work in Hustlers would net her an Academy Award nomination, so upon coming to reality, I see nothing wrong with her getting emotional over the type of honor her career deserves, she is for better or worse a pop icon of the late 20th and early 21st century, an MTV

And now they’ve changed their name to mine, again. Let’s go back and check that permalink, shall we? Interesting. The name changed from Crocodillian in the screen shot above, to mine. Curious. 

Now playing

Just gonna leave this here....since, ya know, evidence is a thing

This society is interesting. And this conflict between Johnny Depp and Amber Heard is indicative of this. People could not even consider that Heard was the sole abuser in this case. In their minds, either Depp (the man) was the sole abuser or both were mutual abusers. Either he was guilty or both of them were. But the

Journalists are failing this country and our democracy. The framing by Rolling Stone is completely irresponsible. Simply parroting what you have been told by officials is not reporting. That is PR.

So we can asume you did not watch the trail.

So we can asume you did not watch the trail. But just the cliff notes.

Just going to point out that Crocodillian (formerly Reproductive Justice) is a troll and has been obsessively posting and dismissing comments here. Once someone is onto their pattern they change their name and avi. I pointed this out a few weeks ago but their account is still active for some reason. See the screenshot

I don’t understand how people are just completely ignoring the trial. I am going mad wondering how people can just ignore it. Did you see anything that happened? It was publicly shown. Heard was clearly guilty. I'm just so blown away by this stupidity.

It must be exhausting to be you and see everything through a lens of victimhood. And then to miss the point so thoroughly just adds to the second hand embarrassment we all feel for you.

Further proving BOTH repubeli¢unts and dumbocrats continue to be the issue for ALL of U.S.

The worst part was we saw video of the trail with evidence that Depp didn’t do anything. So what am I missing here? Are people still believing in her, even though all of her evidence was disproved? I don’t get it.

Look deeper into said UK case and you’ll also see the judge threw out most of Depp’s evidence for... Reasons. When that evidence was applied to THIS case, Depp’s team won.

The real cheerleading—the cheerleading that I know and love—is nothing like what it’s been depicted as (save for Netflix’s Cheer docuseries and Bring It On’s racially diverse and entrepreneurial Clovers led by Gabrielle Union). The real cheerleading is a sport, not a clique of spoiled brats.