I’m sorry, but canvassing could be interpreted as suspicious. Hell, here’s a description of Suspicious Activity on the Oregon City (the county seat of Clackamas) Police Website:

The problem is, Bynum’s actions could be interpreted as suspicious. The problem is that we have been trained to be paranoid. I’m not saying this lady wasn’t racist, and I’m not saying Bynum’s race had nothing to do with why police was called. But we’re post 9/11, where we are taught by the media and everyone to fear.…

Cool.  I have never seen a canvasser in my neighborhood.

Eh. I don’t know if canvassing the neighborhood is “normal” though. Selling lemonade, having a bbq, cutting the lawn, taking a nap in the library, those are all very common occurrences. A politician canvassing the neighborhood isn’t something you see everyday. I’m not saying the caller wasn’t racist, or that Bynum’s…

I don’t see how you all go commando all the time. My underwear is what protects my vag from the pants crotch seam. I can only go commando with very loose pants/shorts. Jeans? No way.

Stop defending this huge piece of shit. You act as though he was some young, naive artist, who had the best of intentions, but got in over his head. Derick Almena was 46 years old when the Ghost Ship fire happened. He charged tenants hundreds of dollars, reportedly as high as $1500/month, to illegally live in a death…

Your estimates are a bit off. Almena’s rent was $4500/month, and he was illegally subletting it to individuals for $565, and couples for $750, (although I’ve read reports of them charging upwards of $1500/month), and that’s not including the fees he charged to host parties and concerts, or the money tenants paid to…

Wilmer Valderrama had 12 years to publicly apologize and recant the lie, but he hasn’t. How anyone can think he’s a “good guy” is beyond me.

1. Is this really what you’re focusing on? She did not choose to make it a public topic. Wilmer Valderramma chose to make it a public topic when he discussed it live on air with Howard Stern in 2006.

You example is not applicable to this instance. In your example, you did not have any intention of groping the other person. It was an accident. In Brendan Fraser’s case, Philip Berk intentionally groped Fraser. It doesn’t matter if it was a joke, or if it was “a sexual advance.” The intent was to assault Fraser.

Yeah, I think it’s pretty shitty to leave out the second photo. The first photo looks a lot more problematic when isolated, what with the hyper neon colors and his goofy expression. When paired with the B&W and much more somber photo, it’s much more obvious that this was social commentary.

For people who are always talking about the Constitution and freedom of speech, you’d think they’d know that it only applies to the US Government. Last I checked, ABC and Disney isn’t the Government, and they’re free to exercise their first amendment rights by cancelling any show they wish.

Don’t forget all the Meghan Markle hashtags (that she has now mysteriously removed 🤔)!

And this is the flattering angle! It looks worse from the front.

This lady is so full of shit. Her instagram post last week totally had the hastag #meghanmarkleweddingdress, as well as other Meghan related hashtags.

This lady is so full of shit. Her instagram post last week totally had the hastag #meghanmarkleweddingdress, as well as other Meghan related hashtags.

This is my problem with Aziz Ansari as well. Like yeah, he didn’t rape anyone, and it wasn’t work place harassment. Congratulations to him? Just because it’s not rape, doesn’t mean it’s okay. I hate how everyone acts like we don’t know the difference between Aziz Ansari’s behavior, and Kevin Spacey, or Harvey…

Right? Like is she going to sue McCall next?

Right? Her dress isn’t nearly as nice as Meghan’s. It’s not very flattering on the model, at least not in the head on photo.

They don’t even share a neckline! The Givenchy dress is a boatneck, and the Wickstead looks more like an off-the-shoulder.