Okay, but that wasn't my question. Would it also bother you if it were a direct remake starring DIFFERENT men?ETA: for any value of "bother" that you like. Would you be less likely to want to see a direct remake starring women than a direct remake starring men (assuming the actors cast in each movie were actors you…

;)

Salem Witch Trials were actually a women-on-women event, so that one can't be blamed on patriarchy. Ultimately, what got that one stopped was the patriarchal government noticed a lot of women were up and dying, realized men were in danger of having to actually learn how to work a kitchen themselves, and stepped in to…

The QI researchers sometimes get things wrong and have to issue corrections, so this might not be entirely right, but they reckon about 75% of all English witch trials ended in acquittal:

"They were men and women who were discriminated against"

True story: my son was 2 1/2 when my daughter was born and he told me he didn't understand how she was eating by just sucking on me. So I squirted him with my breast milk thinking that was the easiest way to show him and that he'd never remember.

Canadian courts, including the Supreme Court, have held that consent is an ongoing process. In simple terms, this means that consenting to have your wrists bound doesn't grow automatically into consent to being punched or choked.

YES. It is a well-used tactic among predators in the BDSM community. And it fucking sucks.

Indeed, it's also pretty common for the guilty to write long screeds about how they aren't guilty and to go around telling everyone they can about how not guilty they are because that's what they *think* an Innocent person would do.
(I've experienced this first hand from rapists who went out of their way to try and…

He does not misunderstand BDSM. He is using sex-positivity/the normalization of kink as a shield because it's so easy to get a pass when you cry "kink shaming!" He knows.

Yep. He probably could have gotten away with abusing women further down the socioeconomic ladder for the rest of his life with few repercussions.

This makes them the "right" kind of victims.

They included accounts from three separate "educated and employed"

It could be argued that reading and commenting on Jezebel is "slactivism" too. And writing for Jezebel just might be "profiteering." As far as I'm concerned, of course. And now I'll give myself a round of applause.

Yeah! Fuck a capitalist endeavor with a positive message! Fuck attracting an audience for serious issues with shocking uses of the word Fuck! All feminism must be serious and have the melancholic strains of Sarah McLachlan playing in the background. FUCK!

Well, to view it consensually you would have to click on a descriptive link first. Given that's not how the comments works, I'd say that's a no.

Anybody who thinks it's hypocritical for us to hate rape and like sex isn't very good at thinking.

Being non-consensually assailed with violent, graphic imagery of rape porn is not even close to the same thing as voluntarily looking at porn that appeals to you.

Are you really saying jokey pictures of naked cartoon characters (in an article you have to choose to click on, with a NSWF warning) are in any way comparable to rape and gore gifs of actual people sent to people without warning?