You should know by now: everyone who’s ever said anything remotely positive about LCK should apologize to every concern troll on the internet, and forever live in shame.

I see a clear pattern with your comments, but I still can’t tell if you are dense, a troll, or both.

Why? Genuine question.

Literally came to say exactly the same thing. Just had this reveal completely spoiled for me and am pretty pissed about it. I think I’m done here.

I just came here to say that this headline bears the same disregard for preserving the viewer/player experience that is starting to make me want to leave this website. There are a lot of people planning on playing this who haven’t.

The internet hate machine is gonna break it’s back jerking it’s own sanctimonious dick over this. Your high horse is awfully fucking high.

Why do I keep seeing this hand wringing over The Punisher glorifying gun violence on the same sites that constantly gush over John Wick?

This article is bad and you should feel bad.

Oh for the love of all fake gods, an accomplice is a person who helps another commit a crime. To not know of the crime isn’t the same thing at all. If LCK told Stewart that he committed a crime, then you might, might be able to make the case that Stewart was knowingly keeping silent to protect LCK. Then he might be an…

The point is that saying “he’s one of the good ones” is a bad way to make a point. Just the same as saying your black friend is one of the good ones because he isn’t in a gang. It is reductionist and ultimately is more insulting to the person who is called “one of the good ones.”

I don’t know if Jon Stewart knew about Louis CK’s misdeeds. And Clayton Purdom doesn’t know. This is the point where it becomes a witch hunt.

Cox and Arquette knew because they had been directly told about an incident which took place on the set of a show they were producing and said that the victim encouraged them to continue production. That’s a lot different from possibly hearing vague rumors. Maybe if there were a similar “smoking gun” showing that…

I thought the original Gawker blind item was an irresponsible load of shit. Turns out I was wrong, but the way it was “reported” seems like hot garbage to me. Unsourced blind items don’t exactly inspire confidence in the veracity of the fourth estate.

one of the few good ones

but he should be held to account to explain it and cop to whatever part he had and whatever wrong he did.

it seems to me like she’s implying that silence on the matter is somehow equivalent to being complicit.

Unfortunately while crime is lower than ever, uncertainty and fear are at an all time high. So people cling to what they consider their own personal virtues. “I may not be able to hold down a job, can’t go 24 hours without a belt of Schnapps, but at least I’VE NEVER TOUCHED A WOMAN’S BOOBY!” (Yeah, no shit you…

Considering that the final line from this article is:

Some people remove themselves from the world of internet rumors (smart productive people who don’t waste their time with internet arguments probably, I wish I were one). And if you think about her close relationship with Louis, it would make sense that people wouldn’t bring up this particular rumor to her.

I can’t wait for my 50's in 2037, where I’ll be arguing on the internet chip implanted in my brain that not all white males are murdering rapists who believe in ethnic cleansing. Because you just know there’s already a few wingnuts out there who are thinking it, and believe it.