whoopingchow
whoopingchow
whoopingchow

This is beyond the scope of this research, but couldn't a more robust analysis be done by examining Football Perspective's WPA? What I'm imagining is basically a way to see exactly how bad a penalty in a particular situation was. The WPA tracker tells you how much a team's Win Probability was affected by any given

Instead of calling your carrier's customer service phone number, call a local store—they can check the ESN for you, too, and probably without a labyrinthine menu/hour-long holds.

Or even East coast teams after a night game on the West coast. They're losing 3 hours after they fly back home—that's gotta affect them some how.

According to FO, they were the best 0-8 team ever, and this recent run certainly cements it

Depending on how you prefer it cooked, put a thin layer of water at the bottom and cook it as is first to get a good sear on it. Take it out and put some onions, carrots, leeks, parsnip (if you're feeling adventurous) in the pot, fill it with water so the water's covering about half-way to three-quarter way up, and

"This road is curvy. Just like Vodka Samm's life"

This is outrageous. He just came back from a pretty serious injury, and he's got over 33% usage rate. Also, Thunder are totally screwed without one of KD or Westbrook (combined 64% usage rate)

No love for rice cookers? As the irrepressibly awesome Roger Ebert wrote in "The Pot an How to Use It", there's literally nothing you can't cook in a rice cooker.

Indie fans have low self-esteem, are creative, not hard working, and not gentle

A list of anecdotes isn't an argument. What about cases when an offense going against a prevent defense failed on the Hail Mary? I don't like Prevent defenses either, but I dislike half-assed 'theses' even more.

This is why I don't like DPOY voting. It's relatively easier to compare linemen, like Wilkerson and Watt, but how do you compare them to Kuchely? Or Earl Thomas? Or Richard Sherman? PFF does a decent job of grading out defensive players, but it's not perfect, and they'll admit that, but that just means that he voters

“Well, I guess I’m a little biased, but I think we’d wipe the field with both of them, but that's just my bias speaking.” the Buckeye wide receiver said. “We’re going to go ahead and handle our business and play our best game every week. We know that we just have to go out and execute. If we go out and execute for a

Hey, at least they're not scrappy, hard-working blue-chippers that rely on their sports IQ to make heads-up plays against more athletic opponents.

Why would this analysis be any different for any other profession? My guess is that the Fortune 500 CEOs also skew from wealthier families, as well as any top earning artists, or marathoners, or anyone at the top of their profession.

To be fair, Jeni's Ice Cream is delicious, and we also have Graeter's, which is also delicious.

{deleted}

NO DAMNIT WE GET LESS RAIN THAN NEW YORK, MIAMI, AND CHICAGO

I mean, that forms the basis of most of our national sports debate, along with "LOL CLEVELAND" and "HURR DURR SEATTLE RAINY"

It's actually not as scary if you break it down into its components.