I weep for these people, it was so obviously sarcastic.  Maybe they stopped reading after the first sentence?

Scorsese has a 50 year career supporting his point.

Scorsese is a bit of a foot in mouth dummy who doesn’t know know how basic words are defined, but I am sure he is smart enough to know his Irishman Oscar chances were middling to poor. It’s not like it was racking up tons of awards.

*checks notes*

Yup, some people win because it is “time” for them to win, because they’ve been good but winless for so long, even if their winning performance is good but no where near as good as their other work. Leo shouldn’t have won for Revenant. Pacino shouldn’t have won for what did he win for, Scent of a Woman? What a joke.

Please don’t call him Cavillman as if the portrayal is his fault. If the script and directing were “Hey Cavill, act like yourself” we would have gotten a far far more comics accurate Superman than what he saw on screen 99% of the time.

Christ, are you an imbecile? The point was about ***which*** of the democrats have a better chance of beating Trump. And you literally vomited out (old, inaccurate) polls which only were about ***a single democratic candidate.***

“by use of their wits and their compassion (and a healthy dose of sex) rather than by behaving like men.”

We shall see...

Yup, good point. I guess we will see what happens. I am still not sure who I will be voting for in the primaries. My personal pick (almost certainly Sanders), or who I end up thinking gives us the best chances later? I imagine those two options still won’t be the same people by then...

Man I hope so. There is a LONG way to go here, but this isn’t a good start for Biden (and Bloomberg is a long shot even with Biden flaming out). A Sanders nomination excites me but worries me more - he’s very far to the left and will painted as such. The “swing voters” in a few key states need to be convinced, not me,…

Probably not.  But would you really not vote for him if he was the nominee?  Because you stated that earlier.  Unless you were just talking about the primaries...

That would be great, but that sounds like an uphill battle, in the face of painting him as a super progressive revolutionary socialist, who wants to make these big huge sweeping changes to government, some of which are very expensive (or at least can be painted as extremely expensive while downplaying the value of…

If you don’t vote for Trump’s opponent, whoever they are, you are voting FOR Trump.

Anecdotes aren’t really evidence though. There are always surprises and some people are just plain silly or illogical.

Best candidates for ***me** policy-wise are Sanders and Warren. Best all around runner-up for me, Mayor Pete.

Yeah yeah, thanks for the lazy answer. You can be realist, or you can be a lazy snarky a-hole, I chose the former as far as politics are concerned.

Unfortunately, no, he doesn’t have a better chance of winning over Biden.  I wish he did, but he doesn’t.

He is already on record saying he will support the Democratic nominee, whoever they are, and will continue to spend 100s of millions on anti-Trump ads after whoever the Dems nominate.

One thousand stars to you sir. Gilroy reshot almost the entire last third of the movie. As well as quite a few scenes in the first two thirds. And was involved in post production editing. And post production in general.