Every single one of them were nominated for best picture at the oscars. Only the last one won. Ian Mckellan was nominated for best supporting actor in Fellowship of the Ring.

Mark Sanchez has been objectively the same level of awful every year, what would really help the jets, and any other team thinking about playing Mark Sanchez would be to not play him, because he's a bad quarterback. It's nice that the Jets defense and running game was so good his first few years so his flaws could…

I'm sorry but I don't understand how this labeling and generalizing helps anyone. It's wrong for anyone to be judged on a series of stereotypes but that doesn't seem to be stopping you in this article.

You forgot to mention that this is also a testament to New Orleans age old tradition of swallowing.

Rest assured, I know what you've done...and I love it.

Does that picture look like Robert Downey Jr. in Tropic Thunder to anyone else?

Why? The benefit of being in the SEC is that you'll win all ties with other teams. The hardship is it's tougher to go undefeated. I think that's a fair trade off.

Too bad Ohio State has sanctions, then we'd have an SEC-less championship game.

I tend not to use fangraphs because I don't like that they use FIP instead of ERA.

He had a .400 OBP it's clear you have no idea how rare a skill and valuable that is.

That you wouldn't be able to explain WAR or any specific issues you have with it that aren't just platitudes you heard on some talk radio show.

It's also a straw man argument because nobody is saying whoever wins WAR should win because again within 1 WAR is within the margin of error. Within 4 isn't. Should I link to what margin of error is or do you think you can work it out phonetically?

You haven't pointed out one flaw. You just keep repeating it like you hope to god it'll make it true.

What do you prefer, batting average? Bill Mueller won a batting title. RBI? Preston Wilson once lead the league at it.

The margin between him and the next best player was 0.3. The margin for Trout and Cabrera was 3.9. It's a stupid comparison.

That is circular logic. He was not one of the best players that season because he's never been a best player in a season. Nick Markakis when he came up could hit for above average power, while getting on base at an elite rate, and he had a nasty arm in rightfield. Is it so impossible to believe on year he threw it all…

Yes people are bad at logic in California too, what is your point?

I'm glad we can finally mark this down officially, I'll fax this response over to New York Times immediately.

Firstly Zobrist is way underrated, secondly a lot of his value came from his defense which a lot of people are reluctant to put a lot of weight on. Thirdly, Markakis lead by 0.3 wins, or within a margin of error. Mike Trout lead by 3.9. There's no way to objectively close that gap. Also your whole paragraph is…

This is the stupidest response ever. All you need is a baseline understanding of what the stats are saying, and then you can look at them on baseball-reference or fangraphs without any extra work. And for you to imply that we should just analyze baseball worse because YOU'RE lazy is a pretty weak fucking argument.