I don’t suppose it would do any good to point out that “sexual” furries are the vast, VAST minority of the furry movement. Most of them are just people who, y’know, like furry art and characters.
I don’t suppose it would do any good to point out that “sexual” furries are the vast, VAST minority of the furry movement. Most of them are just people who, y’know, like furry art and characters.
It’s a bummer to see furries defined by the sexual angle again, but I guess that’s what grabs people’s attention. Nobody’s going to keep scrolling if you call furries “people fascinated with animal symbolism who create their own characters and personas”.