Tribeca is a private organization; they are entitled to screen or not screen whatever they’d like. But I find it troubling that they chose to pull it. If it is useless, un-scientific garbage, let the People watch it and decide. Let’s not deny that this debate is actually taking place (which is obvious by the comment…

right. SEALS endure many different types of training and face incredibly difficult physical demands: surf conditioning, under water knot tying, drown proof testing, etc. what this child did is quite remarkable, but it’s not the hardest part (or a part, really) of SEAL training. she kicks ass though.

yes, but...PERIODS amirite

literally not literally

im at a library w/ no headphones so i am openly admitting that i have not seen the video. but from your description, why, in this specific instance, is Cohen a monster? There was a story printed in the National Enquirer. Cruz has (rightfully) questioned Trump’s character, so why is it not fair for Trump to do the…

yeah except that’s not at all what’s happening. in a civil suit like this, to win, you have to prove damages. so the plaintiff here is arguing how she suffered for over a decade from the trauma of the abuse. that seems reasonable. note, the longer the plaintiff waits to file, the more damages accumulate. for example,…

if the school clarified it’s sexual assault and not rape, why does the headline still say rape?

i share many of those sentiments, particularly the last sentence. i’m a political junkie and never in my life have i been so uncertain about what it is that most American people want. Before Trump, I would have been very self-assured about what is or isn’t possible in the current American political climate. I…

Haha. Yeah, I’ve been tempted to say he deserves it. But on principle, I just can’t. If anyone did that to Bernie or Hil I would NOT be happy about it. Me defending Trump on this is like the ACLU defending the KKK. It’s not out of desire to protect them or their message!

her questions were fair in that if she asked them in a one on one interview, there’d be nothing wrong with it. but it’s bogus as hell that she tried to railroad him (or anyone)in a debate that was supposed to be “fair and balanced” lol. if she asked other candidates cheapshot questions, then ok, but she didn’t. i hate…

women are supposed to be classy? or was that sarcasm. it’s hard to tell what’s humor and what’s reality these days.

preach sista. not offended when it’s true.

he offends people across the board, men and women alike. he’s definitely sexist, but i’m hardly offended at him calling megyn kelly “crazy”. calling an unlikeable woman crazy isn’t that bad. sarah palin is crazy. is that anti-woman?

no way charlemagne didn’t know afro-latinas exist. he’s from NEW YORK, one of the few places where afro-latinas have a strong base. im also not offended that he asked if people were offended cause saldana is dominican. there is obvious cultural tension between african american and caribbean/afro-latina people, so…

nice that you posted his name though. as if he wasn’t embarrassed enough. it’s 100% the same as making fun of someone’s disability- a physical characteristic over which he had no control. how liberal, open-minded, and kind of you. i’m sure your parents are proud of you!

the cite to the AP article links to this jezebel post, not the actual AP article. might wanna fix that.

but i’d rather fuck...?

Unless we are looking at diff stats, the fbi false accusation stats are rape-specific. Sexual misconduct is at issue in this case, which is far less specific than rape both legally and practically speaking. It is also much harder to prove, because physical penetration is not necessary and a rape kit may come back…

you asked if he would like you to attach a bunch of articles showing that “historically” he said/she said favors the accused. i’m guessing you’re referring to disciplinary proceedings rather than criminal (since in criminal, a shred of reasonable doubt is enough to acquit). i’d like to see the articles. i’d believe…

i cannot speak for Big Deal, but I get the sense his/her frustration is that commenters here seem to be ok with the lack of transparency because they like the outcome (that he got expelled). it seems unlike jezebel readers to automatically give deference and respect to a committee or court’s interpretation. look at…