It’s crazy how the right got themselves into such a white frenzy over those assholes torturing that boy on FB. The perpetrators were immediately arrested, charged with all kinds of things, including hate crimes, and most assuredly face stiff jail time. That is what is supposed to happen in a case like this, so people…

What’s the difference between SkyNet and Kellyanne Conway?

“What about all the disabled people he DIDN’T mock?! No one ever talks about them!”

He literally said her father wasn’t a war hero because he was captured.

Waiting for the Republican outrage about how entitled and out of touch Hollywood stars are alienating half of America. Even though we will have a President who is an out of touch, former Hollywood star who alienates half of America.

Monica Crowley isn’t published by HarperCollins; she’s published by the dubious imprint Broadside Books (one of over 100 under the NewsCorp-owned HarperCollins).

Civics? The Donald would never be caught riding in a Civic. America First! /s

Woah she plagiarized Melania too? Ruthless.

Counterpoint: Monica Crowley is an inspirational figure who rose from the South Side of Chicago to become the model she is, today. Her parents urged her on to a better life, noting that, in this country, the only limitations are the scope of your dreams. And hard work. Further, she has lived her life by the motto:…

The fact they supported one candidate over the other doesn’t make Trump a puppet of Putin and it doesn’t make the election results invalid.

Also “high confidence” is a rating term used by intelligence agencies. Such as “top secret” and the like. It doesn’t mean the same as civilian high confidence. I’m pretty sure the rating for the Intel on Bin Laden’s location was even lower on the scale.

It’s not the person who wrote the NYTimes article, it is Hannah who doesn’t understand the NYTimes reporting or what an intelligence analysis is. She’s using a follow up article about Russia’s response as the basis for this garbage. The NYTimes has a whole collection of articles on the intelligence report and this…

As it’s been reported, the publicly released version of the Intelligence community’s report on the election doesn’t include any info that could jeopardize sources and cyber trails. But the top secret version has them.

Wow. This is a total garbage article. Jezebel really needs to rethink its political reporting- really, really not good. Let’s look at the NYTimes. Oh look. Literally the second bullet point front page main points of the article without even clicking on the article itself:

Is anyone stopping to think about the fact that presenting specific evidence would also be very telling to Russia as to how they got it? And given the bleak future we are looking at, they want to keep the sources of that info secure.

But the declassified report contained no information about how the agencies had collected their data

Evidence details would almost certainly include information that could endanger covert operatives. We know Republicans love to unmask covert operatives for political purposes.

This is when he lost his players