I wasn’t alive for Reagan. I said “my lifetime.” I make 50k living in NYC, which here is living close to hand to mouth, and I don’t get a “tax credit”. The IRS and my last 2 tax preparers have told me so.

Any other dumb shit drivel you want to spout?

You’ve had a democratic president for 7 straight years. For a year you had a Filibuster Proof supermajority to do whatever the democratic party wanted. A whole year. That’s enough time for some doctors to write theses. They could have done whatever they wanted. And all we got was the largest increase in tax on the…

What idiot uses deadra hearts for health potions?

I can appreciate why people would like Destiny. But no game I ever played ever bored me to death so quickly as this one. First person shooting against NPCs (A type of game that I’ve grown to not like) and MMO fetch missions (terrible 10 years ago, still terrible now). This game just wasn’t made for me at all. I guess…

If you buy heroin you are directly supporting the hardest terrorists on the planet. I have no idea how these people can live with that moral action, even before they shoot up.

Nukes have been the greatest force for peace in world history. I don’t see any reason why that WWIII deterrent isn’t still alive and well.

She wouldn’t have run faster than a T-Rex with the best pair of running shoes ever made. Why does this matter?

I’m reading it as if it could go both ways. I readily admit that this information could have been classified at a later date. I’ve done so many times in this thread. They, however, have not admitted that there is any possibility that Clinton neglectfully sent classified information. They have pointed out a sentence…

No. I am telling them that their conclusion *could* be correct! but she could have also neglect fully sent classified info as well. There is nothing in the report that indicates either way.

As I’ve already explained countless times, while that statement says that there is a possibility that the information wasn’t of a classified nature to begin with, it does not say that the information was certainly not classified at the time of sending. You are reading into that conclusion yourself.

Read my other replies. You are failing reading comprehension 101 if you think that “we’ve always said that that certainly does not speak to whether it was classified at the time it was sent” means that the emails were 100% unclassified at the time they were sent. All that that says is that classifying the emails now…

It’s good that you’ve given some indication that you bothered to read my last post. Now try reading the other eight to find out how you are wrong with your position.

If you care about security I could see this as an issue for some people. You can’t tell other people what they should and should not care about. You don’t care and that’s fine!

I don’t know how often i need to explain this to you. You can continue to run around with hands over your ears and spouting your lies, because you obviously aren’t reading anything that I’m saying. I don’t care to type to a tree stump anymore.

It was only “newly classified” because it’s been reclassified. Once *again* for like the *third* time: I could send you an unclassified email right now with information that is classified *right now*, that email was published by me, and I am responsible for it’s classification... and I made a mistake. Once it is…

It was recently classified because it was recently discovered by an official. Once again, I could send an unclassified email to you right now with classified information. That email will thenbe reclassified as secret whenever it is discovered. I understand that you probably aren’t around this sort of thing, but this…

Once again, I could send you an unclassified email right now with classified information that is improperly marked. It will be upgraded to classified once it is found out about, and that obviously doesn’t mean that I sent an unclassified email to begin with... I just improperly classified it.

Security doesn’t matter to you... That’s fine, and that’s your right. But security management might matter to other people when they vote on who is going to run our security apparatus for the next 4 years.

It might not have been classified then. We don’t know. That might be an investigation later.

Just because you don’t want this to be a controversy doesn’t mean that it isn’t. And just because you can point to 1 or 2 other people that did this doesn’t make it acceptable either. If I shoot someone, I can’t say that…

They never confirmed that it was not at the time it was sent. Stop reading what you want to read. He said that it “does not speak to whether it was classified at the time it was sent”. That does not support your cause. That just means that it “might not” have been classified at the time, not that it “was not”.