Nah, a pistol would do it just as well. The kind cops carry would be more than enough.
Nah, a pistol would do it just as well. The kind cops carry would be more than enough.
Apparently your question has already been answered, and it turns out, once again, to be the most statistically likely outcome: Racist White Guy in His 20's
Outcomes are germane, since you insisted I could not prove that the law is enforced
Its a silly hill to die on.
To those confused, there is a fight for black voters right now.
I did, I saw no sentencing info.
You would be surprised how little I troll.
Ah, reckless driving.... thats it?
So, according to your interpretation of these written laws, a driver who nudged into a protest, had his windows attacked by protestors and then sped through the group injuring some of them, what charges/punishment do you believe they would face if there was no special law?
Frankly now, I also do not possess the empathy required to take the time to understand your confusion between the first and fourth amendments here
In an ideal world, it would. But we live in reality, where you cant just assume that those holding you and your car hostage have good intent.
After Trump won the NYT were kinda shocked, and vowed to return to actual journalism.
Your claim implicity accuses the protestors of engaging in this activity, when illegal seizure is covered under the Fourth Amendment. What you have here may meet a definition of assembly for unlawful purposes, covered by the First.
*looks at the picture up top*
instead of...you know...trying to run people over with your car.
Do you consider blocking traffic to be reasonable?
You’re getting your Amendments confused, the 4th doesn’t apply in this case.
Quick question: When did it become acceptable practice to drive vehicles INTO actual protesters?