I have to admit, it’s a decent looking car, the specs are pretty good too, and it sounds like a nice place to be. Two questions come to mind however:

If it replaces the stock parts and is lighter and below CG than it would actually raise the CG slightly. 

“Lower center of gravity”

Perfect example of a classic NP right here. 

So I’m assuming the max tow rating is with a dually but all the pictured trucks are SRW. Do we know tow ratings for SRW 2500 and 3500 units?

Take your damn star.

So what you’re telling me is that I am by default on the cutting edge of fashion?

Looks like he went to the Richard Hammond School of Teeth Whitening

Here’s a thought... what if we could convince that crowd that this is THE look?

Take you damn star, you earned it.

Carhartt makes great hoodies in the $40-60 range and you don’t have to look like... well any of these people.

Star for President Not Sure.

Well I’m just going to have to admit I know nothing about fashion.

230HP when new... I’m going to say if it’s been well maintained you’re looking at 190ish now. That’s 90's Explorer territory. You can get a lot for this price or less that’s newer and more powerful with less miles.

I was all ready to hand it a NP until I saw the mileage.

I just can’t wrap my head around why anyone would even sell the 65. It can’t be materially more efficient or cheaper than the vaguely more powerful versions.

I had an old Mazda pickup that left the factory with 88HP and had far less when I owned it and the thing was a wonderful little truck but truly glacial in speed.

115 would be about ideal IMHO

Damn. Ford gets twice the power out of the 1.0EB and that's the least amount of power I'd want in a modern car. 

I'm not colorblind and still thought that.