wfrose
WFROSE
wfrose

I'm glad you realized your mistake after being corrected a dozen times, then.

I think you need to learn to better read sarcasm, especially when it's in context to the previous sentence typed before said sarcasm...

She died when she was 22...

Well, it's either 1000 person team, or a game that takes 10+ years to make, and share holders are going to not be happy with a game turn out rate of that pace. Consider how long it takes for Square Enix to make a Final Fantasy game, and they're nowhere near the sophistication of development needed for AC Unity. Also

Actually, Ubisoft has been pretty good about patch fixes. They threw quite a few of them at Assassin's Creed III and IV. A lot of them...

Bigger games mean more issues to fix. Back in the day games used to just get delayed, often multiple times to years. Even then, that didn't mean bugs didn't slip through, it just means they never got fixed. Now, they can call it gold once it runs relatively stable, and just patch work it as customers play test it for

Games have gotten bigger and more complicated. Consider the fact AC Unity had a team over 1000 people, divided into several smaller factions working on their own aspects to add to the game. Once they get tied in, THEN you're dealing with the hellified issue of bug zapping, stream lining, and play testing. Add to that

Feh, just walk around New York City during a hot summer day. Unphotoshopped boobs everywhere. Not really anything to wait in baited breath for ;p

Problem with putting it in Japan is that it would pretty much end up being another 'ninja game'. If they kept the European assassin in Japan, and probably kept the ninjas as rival enemies, I know the idea would have more appeal to me. But as it is, may as well ask for another Tenchu game instead.

Oh, I can be civil, but that is reserved for those who earn respect; GGers that have perpetuated this mess with the harassment of women and their associates have far from garnered any of that. Sorry, when someone sets out to ruin another person's life for their opinion behind the comfortable screen of anonymity,

The thing is, I don't have to convince you, just give more ammo to the people arguing against you, making it harder for you to keep a front going. I'm arguing to bury you, not change your opinion.

When you start out being all inclusive with 'gamers as a whole' that sets off everyone's persecution senses. As I've pointed out, as many have pointed out, these attacks aren't on 'gamers as a whole', but on that group of gamers that got their feelings hurt. The comments of basement dwelling gaming nerds had all but

Nope, nothing to do with my reading comprehension, let's break down your comment, shall we?

So... the thing is you're getting defensive over the comments of a few people on twitter? and THEN many of those people feeling affronted decide to validate those comments?

I just don't get this argument; you see, I'm a guy, and I've been playing video games for 32 years. Every article or video I've seen of hers points out over relied on tropes, but I've never felt like it was an attack against *me*. Saving the damsel in distress, scantly clad women as scenery, and the submissive, timid,

Not caring if the character is straight or gay is fine. On the other hand, getting defensive about that knowledge is rather homophobic. Maybe it is bad writing, but if it's actually insignificant, then you just ignore it.

Bullshit.

Now playing

This pretty much explains the reasons companies end up having to play the bad guy, even when they don't particularly want to:

Remove the extra 's'es, then remove the 's' from Wasco, and then read his whole comment again...

Of course, it's not 'even close to the point' you're trying to make, it 'never' is, and that's the only defense you guys now have against people shooting down your arguments. Here's the problem with your 'point', when the vast majority of the educated world isn't seeing the difference, it should probably clue you in