wfrose
WFROSE
wfrose

Lazarus pit has a habit of making people insane (thus why Batman doesn't trust it), there's a difference between back broken and having your spinal column completely severed by a bullet, Jason Todd came back to life after an alternate universe Superboy punched reality into submission (not even kidding on this). But

Oh, I was being more sardonic than anything. Yeah, anyone can basically sue for anything if they find it remotely offensive, as long as they can find a lawyer and a judge to review the case. But keep in mind that it's always to the discretion of the courts, and while it may be a generalized comment, it can often be

Sounds unfortunate, though even more unfortunate for you is that you have to prove that I actually libeled or slandered you in the legal definitions of the words. Good luck.

Your rights always end when they encroach on the rights of others. Verbal harassment is not a right when it actually causes psychological and emotional damage; it's also correlated with higher chances of assault, thus why verbal abuse can easily be leveraged into charges of assault in civil cases.

There's this saying, 'the best way to defeat two enemies is to make one an ally'...

Considering that I do exercise for at least 6 hours a week, not including teaching my capoeria and boxing classes (and occasional muay thai private sessions when clients decide to show up and work out), I still clock in a lot of time on Dance Central 3 for exercise. Any way to work out that is enjoyable is worth it.

The thing that always kept me off the GTA series was the control, it always felt sluggish and cumbersome, and while they said they improved it in GTAV, I'm still feeling it, especially in the gun play. That's saying something, considering I grit my teeth and muddled through the control disaster that was Assassin's

It seems more that you're taking an active role in your son's gaming habits than many parents, and that's the more definitive line we can draw. You're aware of the game's content, and you're also a source of moral guidance he can ask if it's right or wrong because of your experience. As much as many parents like to

Since when have you know 10 year olds to skip a sex scene? Or excessive swearing and violence, for that matter?

The best, and I mean THE BEST thing about the "I played them and I'm fine" argument, is that these people demonstrate the exact apathy and lack of empathy that is the concern for most people about these games... by uttering that very statement. It's such a beautiful contradiction.

He doesn't actually come out and say they should stop letting their children play these games, he says the parents should take a more active interest in what they're playing. Hell, I know several parents that do let their children play violent games (even this humble retailer does), but they're *right there* with

Good advise is advise that not only benefits and betters you, but anything that you affect in your life. Your notion of 'good advice' does not take into account amoral and apathetic attitudes. As for you guys focusing on this guy's occupation, perhaps you should focus on him possibly being a *successful* parent,

Um, I think his point was about parents making more an effort about keeping themselves informed on what their children play and observe, not 'you parents suck for what you let your children play and observe'.

Yes, and it got slammed by Kotaku because it was shoddy then. It was pointed out how unresponsive the controls were and how they would even come undone when you just moved your hand away. The game was bad even in the controlled environment, just as it was upon release. Even so, it was stated this was due to it being

Gizmodo attended a demo of the new Kinect, and the improvements were... very... impressive...

Um, the closest this even comes to a legal definition of a threat would be to injure someone's reputation, which she did not, he did that himself.

Once again, we are going by this guy's definition of a 'threat'. He left his business card there, which has his information on it, when no one requested it, which means no one had any obligation to protect its contents. He decided it was a 'threat' because he had a vendetta, and she gave him ammo. Unfortunately, there

The 3-5 'arbitrary' system is two verbals, a written on the second or third, another verbal, and a final for complaints before termination. It has been that way at every job I have been at from America Online to Target, particularly on 'hearsay' cases where a supervisor has not witnessed the situation but received

She offered a publicly circulated business document to her customers that she was granted; that's pretty much like getting pissed off that she told them to look him up in the phone book. If he really cared, he would have taken his business card with him, because she has no obligation to remove it from the counter from

Does the second "B" now mean "beautiful," "black," or "blonde"? :p