Not bad, but #2 on that list is already taken by Demolition Man:

As I recall, the only laugh of that scene was Palmer’s precision usage of an F-bomb. Which was, bar none, the single best of use of the F-word in cinematic history.

Also horse girl. You’re in good company.

Overall the key takeaway is that organised labour is important. King married the race and class dimensions, but that is often ignored in favour of a sanitised view of him as purely an anti-racist. Ultimately there is nothing the establishment fears more than everyday people united both racially and on class lines.

It’s not. If you’d prefer the term “Eisenhower Republican”, use that instead. The point in either case is the same: nothing that Warren espouses would be considered anything but business as usual if this were 1956.

They did Warren few favors by calling her a radical, though. I was just trying to convince my dad the other day that her ideas weren’t as radical as they seemed, and here’s the fucking NYT undoing all my hard work. I see Warren’s (and Sanders’s) campaigns as sensible, progressive campaigns. Calling them radical…

“In this election, British voters face a choice between divergent visions for the nation’s future.

I wish (or rather, do not wish given the subject matter) that this was my story. Rather, this is the story about how I taught a co-worker an invaluable cooking lesson.

As jarring as this was to see this photo on Lara Trump’s Instagram story (with the message “Get your #Trump2020 Snapchat filters today”), she’s, unfortunately, not pretending to be a representative for The Blacks™. She’s promoting Black Voices For Trump, an organization for black supporters of President Trump.

I have moved left as I’ve aged, largely because I realized that I had a choice.

Absofuckinglutely.

The big reveal is that all along this has all just been preparation so they’ll be ready to go to the next stage of existence, on a planet called....

I’m 90% sure I won’t make it out of the gray’s because it seems in today’s society even simply asking a question automatically pits you against someone...but I’m sincerely curious about this. Do that many people really believe that Hillary lost because almost half of our country is sexist?

Respectfully, I disagree, mainly because I think the term “had” is a very strong verb to use when, even at your weakest, you have 59 votes in the Senate. “Obama wanted to sell Republicans” is a much more apt verb. And it’s also the crux of the issue.

If it’s down to winning reliable voters, then Democrats have lost regardless because the Republicans have rigged the system such that merely-reliable Democratic voters aren’t enough. Hillary Clinton got the merely-reliable Democratic voters, and she lost. It is up to Democrats not to win, but to win by such large…

Uh, yes. Not to put too fine a point on it, but the people that are voting for Biden are voting him specifically because they intend to vote for “Generic-Wherever (D)“, and he’s the consensus establishment Democrat. Terminology aside, of course their vote can be taken for granted; they’re explicitly saying that they…

As a fellow Warren supporter, this is the correct take. I don’t doubt that Bernie made remarks about the electability of a woman candidate, because he was probably saying what we’ve all thought in the wake of 2016: wait, is this country too sexist to elect a woman? I personally believe it isn’t, which is part of why I…

Have to say that my first reaction is “Oh crap. This is just going to hand us Biden as a candidate.” Which I don’t want, partly because I perceive Biden as serving my interests least. If, after all, your entire campaign pitch is “let’s return to the normal Obama years!”, I am forced to remember that the “normal” Obama…

I myself think it could, it’d just be the magnum opus of whomever did the adaptation.

Just offhand, suppose you dropped out after Lich King, but wanted to play through with your old 80's? Is there a way to resurrect those characters, given that they’ve probably been deleted?