werty8472
8472
werty8472

Oh man, that sucks. That's why you should never lose a bet.

Cool.

You gave me a hypothetical situation. I gave you an alternative answer to what you considered to be the only conclusion. I did not say your accounting of the post by this hypothesis was true, I only had the answer to what other ways you should have considered this information had it been. You may thank me, if you

Mm. I have a point, and those who would rather stick their own feet into their mouths to avoid seeing it probably are good enough at what they do to at least be successful in this endeavor. And no, there are two proper progression pathways to consider if no one whatsoever found any merit in what you said:

1) A sign

I guess you're lucky that this hasn't been a problem for you. Kudos for staying cool when life gives you lemons.

My friend, I fear you are mistaken. Not every whim deserves a considered response. You're simply wrong, and the attention you're drawing because you feel like you deserve 'intelligent' responses to what amounts to a poorly thought out and deviant comment chain is illogical in itself. You do not get to be the

Hey, there are plenty of people with business degrees and no vision that can't screw things up. Don't forget that person has to also already have money.

Nope. Just nope.

Agreed! Thanks Kotaku! Can't wait to see next year's!

They fixed that in the future.

I sort of meant both, on the terms about Chatterbot. I only used Chatterbot as an example of realistically conversing conversational data mining artificial intelligence, by the by.

So, again, not completely aware of how the programming works on all this, so forgive me for being novice: What if ANGELINA was able to

Okay, I'm a bit of an AI fan. Forgive me if anything I say sounds stupid and idealistic.

Does ANGELINA have any way to add additional consideration points? If you mixed Chatterbot and ANGELINA to have a shared 'vocabulary', would ANGELINA be able to consider weighted conversation points as a means to program

Don't they say it's like 2,000 years in our future?

Technology regresses after society collapses. Society collapses when Titans appear "out of nowhere". Society starts to get back together after the three walls are built. The quasi-steampunk atmosphere is from post-apocalyptic reanimation of prior day technology.

Treason is the ability to kill people for disagreeing with them. Burn the flag, and scuff the laws. Freedom is a lie.

Everyone you talked to.

Dude, situations are complex, and suing people because you're not happy is silly.

That, and butt cancer.

Soooo... What you're saying is that in (Soviet) Russia, game plays you?

Disagree.

Evidence this. Prove that she did no research. At that point she was describing the Smurfette Syndrome, which may be what you're confused by. Ignoring this, she likely did research about a number of other things besides 'playing Scribblenauts Unlimited for more than ten minutes'.

Look, she made an eloquent and

She doesn't need to say 'Ms. Males are bad'. She researched the topic, provided evidence, and explored the meaning. Providing how you should feel about the topic would make less sense coming from the presenter than from the viewer.

She also did research these findings, regardless of whether or not people who, should