Nope. Just nope.

Agreed! Thanks Kotaku! Can't wait to see next year's!

They fixed that in the future.

I sort of meant both, on the terms about Chatterbot. I only used Chatterbot as an example of realistically conversing conversational data mining artificial intelligence, by the by.

So, again, not completely aware of how the programming works on all this, so forgive me for being novice: What if ANGELINA was able to…

Okay, I'm a bit of an AI fan. Forgive me if anything I say sounds stupid and idealistic.

Does ANGELINA have any way to add additional consideration points? If you mixed Chatterbot and ANGELINA to have a shared 'vocabulary', would ANGELINA be able to consider weighted conversation points as a means to program…

Don't they say it's like 2,000 years in our future?

Technology regresses after society collapses. Society collapses when Titans appear "out of nowhere". Society starts to get back together after the three walls are built. The quasi-steampunk atmosphere is from post-apocalyptic reanimation of prior day technology.

Treason is the ability to kill people for disagreeing with them. Burn the flag, and scuff the laws. Freedom is a lie.

Everyone you talked to.

Dude, situations are complex, and suing people because you're not happy is silly.

That, and butt cancer.

Soooo... What you're saying is that in (Soviet) Russia, game plays you?

Disagree.

Evidence this. Prove that she did no research. At that point she was describing the Smurfette Syndrome, which may be what you're confused by. Ignoring this, she likely did research about a number of other things besides 'playing Scribblenauts Unlimited for more than ten minutes'.

Look, she made an eloquent and…

She doesn't need to say 'Ms. Males are bad'. She researched the topic, provided evidence, and explored the meaning. Providing how you should feel about the topic would make less sense coming from the presenter than from the viewer.

She also did research these findings, regardless of whether or not people who, should…

But that's what you just did when you said 'you could just not have females', in relation to Angry Birds, and then I said 'that's what she said'. You went from there to asserting that 'it's all or nothing with her'. Okay, granted, you said it wasn't bad, and then it was. But I'm pretty sure that's on the same page…

She also made a pretty significant point about how she agreed that 'dressing in all pink with hearts is hardly the worst thing a young girl can see in a game'. Although, when she said it, it sounded more like, "Taken on their own, each individual example we've covered in this episode may seem benign or trivial. But…

You did watch the video, right? She basically had a 3 minute speech about how it was better just to not have females. The genders were already ambiguous up until they made the distinction themselves. That was... yunno... her entire point about it.

B: Things like the Angry Birds thing happen a lot.

It's Oregontrailpunk.

Work IS hard. Good thing we're talking about video games. People who are purists about it are cool, but it's hard for me to get mad at a person who spent enough time to understand all the mathematics behind the game, but decided to spend a couple hours or days on the game, rather than months and months. Not to…

Either you've never tried to do anything with IVs, or you do IVs all the time.