I’m sure a better question should've been, "are you okay?" considering that they were on a wellness check. 

I like it. And the lyrics come through more clearly, too.

Let’s see how many conversations this next week I can work “And I killed Sparky too!” into.

You must be fun at parties.

Louis CK had a redemption arc? Was it before or after his distinctly incel-ish club appearances where he was all whining about how unfair cancel culture is?

So your main takeaway from her post is that she writes funny, not that there was some (at the least) creepy shit going on that they had to make a rule like that in the first place? She was like 14 years old.

Thing is, he doesn’t really owe us details - it’s an open secret that Joss Whedon is a piece of crap. We didn’t know the details of him firing Charisma, but it’s been known he did it because she was pregnant for a long time. And his ex-wife wrote an open letter a few years back detailing some of his abuse and…

This is a really harsh review! Obviously with SNL there are always jokes or sketches that fall flat, but I haven’t laughed this much watching a new episode in a while.

No... no... this makes no sense what so ever. If anything Frank would have been unveiled to be Q - as a scam to get people to buy things from him, like the gun / water episode. Mac & Charlie would have done “Patriot Shit”, but wrong - like harassing republican politicians and building a fort for themselves to live in.…

Oh man I think everyone (who does and doesn’t know about this) would loose their shit! I hope it happens!

I think the reveal we got last episode was a) necessary and b) perfectly timed.

Remember how they’re celebrated as the resistance?

The neo-con Lincoln Project is essentially a scam for liberals who think there are Republicans to be swayed (despite all the money donated to the Lincoln Project, Republicans actually voted at a higher rate for Trump than in 2016).

Not just greedy, immoral too.

This is going to be absurdly petty, but to know Rich as performatively academic is to read his thing a while back where he conducted the most boring interview possible with John Waters — which for a gay culture section journalist, like, how?

Consent should not be an issue in this specific case as these images are and have been placed on social media, but I’m sure an argument can be made for it, but it would be weak.

“Performatively academic” is the best description of Rich I’ve ever read. Thank you. The way in which he has been elevated to Gay Men spokesperson on this site over the past few years is infuriating. I’m a gay man too, and superficially similar to Rich in many ways - white, reside in a large city, etc - but his…

These people chose to post pictures of these events. They 100% did it to themselves. Literally they just had to not post pictures of it to avoid scrutiny because no one would know. Well unless they’re in a country where people get fined or arrested for doing these things then we’d know if they got caught. Is Rich…

The Instagram account in question mostly blasts people at circuit parties and stuff. It’s not like, having a couple friends over for your birthday, it’s packing several hundred into a club for an overpriced event (and mostly targeting influencers). The account is definitely punching up.

This is a very verbose, detailed way of justifying dangerous behavior in a pandemic by deeming public shaming as equally problematic. (If ___ is so shitty, then why isn’t ____?)