So no? No then. It’s been a slice, stay bubbly.

K.... lemme know if you wanna talk about anything I’ve actually said.

look, I’m not an anti-feminist. I’ve chipped in my two cents as to how I think criminals are motivated and why I don’t think all crimes are hate crimes; and you’re welcome, even encouraged to disagree. Multiple times I’ve pointed out how terrible rape always is. I won’t apologize for the analogy because the comparison…

Maybe I was a bit of an asshole right now but I was nothing but civil prior to your assholery. Kesha is a victim, you are an aggressor. See the difference?

qualified it in the very same sentence but thought this might help as well http://www.dictionary.com/browse/analogy…

Seconded, how is he even allowed to post here? This is actually one example of a voice that jezebel would not be in the wrong to censor. *gets account greyed*

You’re absolutely right, and I believe I made it clear in the very same sentence that I wasn’t equating the two. That’s the thing about analogy, it compares aspects of things.

Hell yeah, be mad, rape is a terrible thing. But I would argue the difference in this situation is the rapists’ potential to gain. They’re taking something from another person for themselves because they want it for themselves and they don’t give two shits what they have to put someone else through to get it. I’m by…

Yeah. Not being too familiar with how these cases normally play out, I would think a hate crime would be defined more based on the motivations of the aggressor than on the the group the victim happens to fall into. Not being too familiar with this case, if there’s evidence that doc Luke harbors prejudice towards women…

I feel like most are “just for funsies”. In my opinion most criminals don’t think about the statement they’re making or the demographics they’re harming. They think about what they’re gaining for themselves, period. Horrible acts of selfishness don’t need to be motivated by politics or prejudice; I’d bet they’re more…