websnap-old
websnap
websnap-old

Yes. I, my wife, my co-workers and friends must all be lucky.

Sorry, but that's just not true. I have personally (accidentally) done more than a slight drop (twice) and it was barely scuffed... "Unusable" is an extremely incorrect exaggeration. Look it up on Youtube. people have run it over with a vehicle and while the glass may be broken it still can recognize touch input and

That's understandable if you are rough with gadgets. Quite a few people here in the office have them and they've been fine. There are always extenuating circumstances, of course, but generally it's about being careful without a case. Like I said, I dropped it twice on concrete (stupid shallow hoodie pockets) and the

word. +1

I've dropped mine twice on concrete (which is ironic because up until a month or so ago I almost always had it in a case) and the worst result I got was a scuff on the bevelled edge of the glass. At that point I said screw it. If the only time I ever drop it is when I forget to put a case on it and that's the worst

I don't think it's because he's republican so much as he said it in the county in florida where most liftoffs, engineers and general space exploration is centralized as well as insinuating a second term win (and how that was "delivered"). Lets say this. If he won and said it in his inauguration speech or the state of

Ok, dude, first off, I'm Portuguese so consider me "familiar". Second, Portugal had an insane flood caused by heavy rains and winds from one of MANY storms that effected the area just last year (but if it's not about you, you don't remember, I guess).

You should maybe look up the weather in Portugal... it's a Mediterranean climate where they aren't strangers to tropic-like storms since they are right on the ocean... sounds familiar...

word

"A warning label provides information. A picture of a black, dried out, cancerous lung incites a strong emotional response. A warning label is meant to honestly express the dangers facing potential consumers. A picture like that is meant to scare them away."

"Its is very biased. Not everyone who smokes requires a hole in their throat or will die of lung cancer. It is about as anti smoking as you can get. How is that not biased?"

I fail to see how that would be propaganda, as it is neither biased, politically leaning or misleading in information. How is showing a photo of a cancerous lung any different than writing on the package that this product in your hands has been proven to promote cancerous growth in lungs?

We've had those labels here in Canada for a long time, and while i don't have data to back it up, in my extended circle (friends and family, and their friends and family and so on) there was an impact... especially when kids saw it. it was gross and started dialogue, one that boring text wouldn't do. they now no

+1

comics haven't been worth anything in a while. they print too many, they aren't rare and the internet sales has dropped the prices down.

yep. In practice for a while on their pop devices and knowing apple, heavily tested before then.

wow, asshole much? I don't usually toss that out at lame, anonymous commenters but that level of callousness displayed in your comment is extremely disheartening. Politics aside, your laughing at other people's injuries is cruel. The cops should be checking to see if animals are missing in your neighbourhood.

The amount of damage that can be done by a minuscule growth missed by a yearly checkup between the following one is staggering. it's up to her to weigh between the best of two horrible scenarios.

I don't know, apple has had that multi-directional swiper for quite some time in back of house @ the apple store... years... wouldn't be surprised if it soon comes to light that it, also was patented, just later that this one was.

I think with the average woman, yes... but it don't think it takes into account the BRCA1 gene, greatly increasing the risk. Then think about having a child to lower your chances of cancer only to leave them behind.