The pic itself is (as another commenter noted) lazy, but the “Take it” part... that’s where I find myself getting (mildly... bc I’m numb to this shit nowadays) offended.

The female photographer excuse WAS pretty convenient to be able to drop into the convo like that.... token Black Friend?

Me, too, or some kind of home mammogram machine.

Not “sexy” or “beautiful”. It’s cold, boring and very “doctor’s office brochure”-looking, like a public service announcement reminding you to schedule your mammogram.

Jesus. You know what else has “beautiful curves” to contrast with the “straight lines of the product?”

“The photographer and designer behind that ad is a girl.”

Ladies, come on it was done by a woman and therefore couldn’t possibly be sexist!

Funny enough the photographer and designer behind that ad is a girl...

Plus, the actual boob image looks more like a picture from a self-exam pamphlet.

Funny enough the photographer and designer behind that ad is a girl 

Considering that this is an ad, the photographer didn’t actually come up with the CONCEPT for the ad, she just shot some photos. Ask the Creative Director and the Art Director who actually came up with the concept. I a), bet they’re both men, and b), the alleged contrast had nothing to do with their rationale.

i thought this was some sort of home mammogram thing.

Marketing to children is one thing, but marketing to nursing babies? That’s pretty low.

So that makes it okay?

If you’re gonna put tits in an ad, it should make contextual sense.

This ad is so over the top and ridiculous, I expected to see Nigel Tufnel from Spinal Tap in it.

Funny enough the photographer and designer behind that ad is a girl

We work with music and musicians, from all genres, religions, colors, sex, and backgrounds…and we support freedom, plurality and equality across the board.

I’m gonna go out on a limb and say it’s...

Why are they having children design their adds?