That makes no sense, net income is a measurement of "extra cash". For a company like Tesla which is a growth company to report net income is like throwing money into the garbage. Mostly companies report net income/net profit when they reach an end to their growth cycle, as long as they are growing, the money is better…

Actually, you are wrong. Tesla has had a 25% gross profit on a GAAP basis for a few quarters already. They plan to hit 28% by end of the year. So considering they are doing better and better each quarter and have industry leading gross profits, do explain. your rational.

They are just trying to be realistic, Trump had 5 bankruptcies. They need to do at least 2 more for Burns.

By difference as in technologically or for the consumer?

Impala: 26.8k MSRP
Silvarado: 25.5k MSRP
Equinox 24.4k MSRP

I understand if they get over 30k with options. And there are exceptions like Corvette which is a signature in their brand. I am even ok with large cars going in the 30k territory due to the premium versions tend to be more expensive. But for a…

No, I am saying over 30K is premium car territory and anything selling in that territory is competing against premium brands.

Tesla Model III will be just as affordable. And made from a company that won't crush the car when they are done.

Because you are assuming they want to do that. It boils down to agenda and goals. What the old manufacturers want are government contracts that are cost plus. They know there is a limited amount of them and they also know they need to involve as many states as possible to get support from senate.

Realistically speaking, I have my doubts. I have a feeling GM is simply trying to seem relevant.

A reusable first stage rocket takes up 30% less payload, and costs 10X less to launch. A fully reusable rocket would cost 100X less to launch.

Because the old companies are not run by visionaries but by accountants. Accountants can't see space past their checkbooks.

Tesla has made it clear, the 35k base is WITHOUT incentives.

yup, the wings will provide rain cover until the umbrella is opened.

A lot of people are interested in the Model X. And no they are not going to use those stupid physical buttons. Every physical button you need is on the wheel. For everything else there is a touchscreen.

The Tesla Model 3 isn't quite as inspiring as the Model E – for obvious reasons – but that's what Elon is naming Tesla's entry-level sedan. Oh, and Tesla Roadster owners are getting a battery upgrade, too.

They will come up with uberEXTREME which they bring you a high performance car and you get to drive it instead of them.

He should have at least installed 80A ones, it would have cut down that to 4 hours. That said, having chargers at hotels, even 8hr ones are useful to have if you plan on dropping by the hotel.

He could have also cut down his cost if he would have asked Tesla. Tesla gives free twin chargers to hotels.

There is a supercharger route from FL to WI. So no.

The thing about settlements is public announcements are not the same as reality. I am more than willing to bet Tesla paid for the cars deprecated value and didn't cover legal fees, in exchange, this lawyer and his client get to save face.

I mean in court, Tesla has evidence of tampering and the guy had a previous case…

With regenerative braking you rarely use the normal brakes.