Again, not exactly! Which comes back down to the difference between gross profit and free cash flow. For example, they recently added a factory in Tilburg that will manufacture cars locally in Europe. So now cars that have previously dealt with import and shipping cost plus downtime between getting to consumer will be…

Really? Then who has higher annual profit margins than Tesla? Do tell. Then we will calculate.

I actually didn’t even bother clicking the link the moment I saw seekingalpha. That said based on your comment I can easily guess the article is written by logicalthought. If so, since I have debated with him in the past, I can pretty much guess what the article is about without reading it.

No they do not, free cashflow is not the same thing as profit.

They should be able to hit free cashflow positive this year just fine. That said, even if they did decide to sell more stock, the stock is still worth a decent amount and will probably jump on the unveil of the Tesla Model 3 even more.

SeekingAlpha is a pretty terrible source to use to make your point. It is filled with wannbees who write click-bate articles to earn 0.01 per view that SeekingAlpha gives them. It got so bad, Yahoo dropped the mfrom their news feed.

I got the joke just fine, and it makes sense for anyone who just read the headline and ignored the article. But if you read the article and noticed it doesn’t quite match the headline, the joke doesn’t make sense.

The Model S is produced on the same line as the Model X. So if there was a supply issue or technical issue with the Model X, Tesla can use the same line to produce more Model S cars. The only thing that can cause delays is line issues, but that would be highly unlikely.

Sorry if I wasn’t clear, I was referring to gross profit margins. Aka gross profit as % of revenue.

You say that but forget that we are on the internet where 90% of people don’t get past the headline.

ha? Where does it say they are not meeting the deadline promised. So far sounds like everything is on track.

The stock has little relevance on the company itself.

Bolt:
With: 30k
Without: 37.5k

Model 3:
With: 27.5k
Without: 35k

But it should be noted the incentives are capped to 200k cars then will decrease per quarter till they hit 0.

To be clear, GM said 145$ per kwh at cell level. So it is more expensive at pack level. Though I don’t think you need 60kwh to hit 200 miles range. You can probably do better if done right.

Tesla will most likely sell them in first year at about break even, maybe slight loss at worst. From then on the economies of scale of the gigafactory will secure their margins as price drops.

Effectively, what we will be getting a peak at is most likely the “Alpha” Model 3. Just like with Model S and Model X unveiling.

A dashcam can run even if the car is not running if it has its own battery such as a LUKAS LK-530-12V Dash Cam Smart Power Supply Battery Pack.

I think who ever shit on his car messed with the wrong Model X owner.

What are you talking about? The Cadillac is not fully electric, it had a Volt drivetrain.

I think GM completely messed up, they shouldn’t have produced the Volt nor the ELR at that pricetag.