That's only on over-the-air TV because it's regulated by the idiots of the FCC. However, with Cable TV you can show as many nipples as you would like. There is no bans or regulations in the US. Same with movies and games, there is no bans on either of those.

You don't know what you're talking about, the US doesn't censor anything. You can put as many "titties" as you want in movies and cable TV, there's zero bans. You can say whatever you like (except for there's a bomb on the plane, fire in a movie theater, etc).

Why? What's the point of inventing something new when what we already have works perfectly? My mouse works on almost every surface, it even works on glass. Laser mice are very accurate and the dpi can go up to huge amounts. Just because it's old does not mean it should be replaced.

I loved that book! It would be awesome if they turned that into a movie.

I'll never understand why people will critisize some games for "trial and error" but then say how a game like Dark Souls is amazing when all that game is is trial and error.

I hate people like you, always bringing political arguments into everything. And then you act like you don't know why it had to turn into an arguement about guns. You knew exactly what you were doing when you posted that link.

You make a good point. I could see it eventually happening but I still think it's going to be a long time. My experience with OnLive wasn't good and even Steam Streaming has input lag for me but that is probably mostly caused by the decoding/encoding.

They said they needed the latency of the Rift to be no higher than 19ms. They got it down to around 15ms.

I don't think you understand how VR works. You have to have zero delay. It's impossible to have no delay when a server sends an image to your screen and then you see that image and send input back to the server. Not even on a local network is the delay low enough for VR to work.

If VR like the Occulus Rift takes off game streaming won't ever be possible.

I didn't mean more value in a money way. To me the PS4 and One are just overall better. If I got them all for free and they were all worth nothing I still wouldn't care about the Wii U.

Steam sales are much better than used games. With used games developers get nothing, with Steam sales developers get the money.

I don't own any consoles so I don't have a reason to be biased. I should have been more specific, when I said superior I meant better hardware. It also helps that the PS4 and One get a lot more third party support.

I was hoping no one would notice but I had a feeling someone would point that out. I know how to spell superior. I quickly posted that from my phone but by the time I noticed my incorrect spelling I could no longer edit my comment.

Heck with the chair, you're one of the lucky people that got the Steam Machine! Lucky!

This game does NOT support local split-screen. Plus, even if they wanted to the Wii U wouldn't even be able to handle it. 5 player split-screen on a game like this would be much to demanding for the Wii U. I don't think you understand how much more power it takes to run on different screens.

It's not even a split screenscreen game... There's no way the Wii U would be able to run this game, especially not with split screen. Having 5 different screens would be extremely demanding to run.

They should be afraid because no one would buy this if it was released on the Wii U. Everyone would ignore the Wii U version and buy it on the supurior next-gen consoles and PC.

They should be afraid because no one would buy this if it was released on the Wii U. Everyone would ignore the Wii U version and buy it on the supurior next-gen consoles and PC.

Many developers, including Valve and Bethesda, actively encourage people to mod their games.