Wrong. “Study after study” of automation unrelated to these features in cars have shown that. It’s exactly what MIT expected to find when they studied driver behavior in Teslas. But they found the opposite. Drivers with Autopilot are just as attentive and no study has found otherwise.

I think people who say what other people probably are, simply so they can say so, are the types of people whose opinions are irrelevant.

I believe that just because people say in comments that Tesla didn’t do so doesn’t make that true. It’s been studied. Drivers know what it does. The word Autopilot has been used in cars for over 60 years, it is the most popular name for cruise control outside of the US and was the only name for cruise control in the…

No, case law allows millions of cars on the road that do a lot less to help an inattentive driver.

You don’t need to read the manual if you’ve already driven a minivan. You do need to look at it for a Tesla because if you don’t, you won’t know how to even turn on Autopilot. If someone enables the features for you, you then adjust the seat and create your own driver profile, you will find that everything went back…

Because you said so? It's been studied. 99% of Tesla owners are well aware of the limitations, and that's likely much higher than the percentage who use the feature.

That would describe virtually all cars on the road. But with most of those, an inattentive driver using cruise control could crash whether holding the wheel or not, and the cars don’t stop when they detect that the driver is not holding the wheel.

Yes, the whole thing is rather silly. Had the driver kept a hand on the wheel and hit the truck, they would have argued that the driver WAS in control of the vehicle but wasn’t paying attention. Had she been driving a 1976 Buick LeSabre, and holding the wheel, it would have been the driver’s fault for not paying…

I never liked them, but my brother used to eat them. It was due to false advertising. They promised that it would keep the bullys [sic] away.

There was a lot of concern about the single screen for the Model 3, ranging from critics to prospective buyers alike. Once the car came out, reviewers barely mentioned it, and perhaps had one line saying that it took no time to get used to.

Yes, it changed a number of years ago. It used to be prohibited in the Merchant Agreement of every major issuer. Then I think a court ruling changed it.

Critics here don’t care about actual experiences. Don't let reality get in their way.

They would if customers found out that it’s a problem without it. But the only critics are people who aren’t going to buy one anyway. In real life it's one of the most ergonomic designs on the market.

It does. And if you drove one you'd know it. 

My car has air conditioning. It will cool the inside from 105 degrees Fahrenheit to 70 in about two minutes. I can do it with an app so there’s no need to get into a hot car. And the roof is tinted so there’s no issue with light.

Yet strangely, critics want to have it both ways. They point out his awkward speaking style, his meandering, overall lack of presentation skills, and that his one joke is overplayed and wasn’t very funny in the first place. Then they tell us how he’s a slick salesman and a con man.

Well there’s that, and there’s something called the real world. If you go by what most Model 3 owners would really pay for gasoline if they had a different car, it would be closer to $4/gallon. It’s easy to use a US average and ignore the costs where EVs are most popular, but anybody buying one would have to go by…

It’s purpose is to get people to write article’s with extra apostrophe's. 

I don't care if you judge my order any more than you care if I judge your writing. I'm don't buy coffee at Starbucks for a living.

Most people with a net worth of$10 million dollars can live just fine for the rest of their lives. Making that much every year still puts people under the threshold.