The Celtics have won 21 playoff series’ in the 30 years since Bias died. You’re not haunted by shit.

Except that whole FA Cup final thing.

This. Gun to my head and I HAD to vote for one of them I pick Trump and it isn't that hard.

If you think Dwight gives a fuck about on-the-court concerns, then you’re wrong about Dwight’s priorities.

Your first paragraph was pretty dumb and you seem to be digging deeper in that regard, but I wholeheartedly agree that Pat Tillman was an absolute badass and Peter King is a little shitheaded pussy. Let’s just leave it at that.

So are we mad Harden did a blatant push-off and didn’t get called for it, or happy the refs didn’t make that kind of call at the end of the game?

Total embarrassment. No excuse for it at all. I say this as someone whose first Eagles season tickets were in the 700-level end zone.

Why would anyone care that their name is attached to a criticism of free market capitalism?

I don’t see why, in a year in which beloved ex-coach Jerry Tarkanian passed away, that the boosters from UNLV haven’t pooled their resources and got a replacement at coach who not only understood the Tarkanian legacy but in many ways has become the true heir to the Tarkanian Royal Blood.

“Therefore, we overrule People v. Ventura, 262 Mich.App. 370, 686 N.W.2d 748 (2004), to the extent that it held that the Legislature affirmatively chose to modify the traditional common-law rule that a person may resist an unlawful arrest.”

But shouldn’t you look at the payouts? The women received $2 million from FIFA for winning the WC. The US men earned $9 million to get to the 2nd round in their WC.

They’re only more economically successful when you remove the World Cup revenue, which is the primary reason national teams even exist.

I’m tempted to say the fact that the women would almost assuredly to left high and dry in such a scenario while the men would still be just fine is probably the main reason they are paid to begin with.

“touring funk band quantities of cocaine”

by hypocrisy i assume you’re referring to the heavily promulgated myth that it was somehow “un-american” to criticize bush and the chickenhawks in his administration during his presidency, while since 2008 insecure white men who reduce everything to race, like yourself, have constantly tried to de-legitimize obama’s…

That’s very possible... but he (or the union) could still file a grievance in that case saying that he was constructively fired and is entitled to whatever comp he’d get if he had been released normally. In theory.

Which isn’t a sin in and of itself. NASCAR is a business after all, and businesses are obligated to do nothing in this world but to make money.

But isn’t that (your last sentence) partly the point? The POTUS isn’t a king, he/she can only do so much. So why should NASCAR risk tainting their (recently) fragile image by endorsing anybody?

Except...she doesn’t show her flaws, nor does she accept herself the way she is, and neither does her husband.