Rarely.
watu
watu
I think you should read the definition you posted again.
Your 1st paragraph: I partially agree. I think if it had been worded less vulgar it would have flown under the radar. But the faux outragers have managed to sidestep your argument by saying it was the implications of his words, not the vulgarity. But in my opinion that just makes them seem petty and knit-picky and…
Seeing lots of people say "Awww isn't it sweet they kissed and agreed to disagree."
Yeah but removing the vulgarity and then still having them whine, helps break down what the kickers are in a bunch for- nothing at all.
Agreed. Dice would make an awesome version.
I think it's fair to say one can be skeptical based on developers AND publishers.
Well you are assuming less than 30 seconds' worth of thought has gone into paying the $60.
Senator in "I can't understand why big companies would stand up for the little people?" Shocker!
The company wouldn't exist to exploit the workers without you- the consumer. What part of that do you not get?
That's funny, holds a lot of truth and is often trotted out on posts like this- but there's a difference between language that simply offends, and language of that is part of oppression or marginalization.
lol, I'm confused now....
"thing is, i doubt many gay men go up to someone and say 'hey, mind if i push your shit in?' as a pick up line."
To be more inclusive, things that could be construed as homophobic- or at the very least insensitive- would have ideally been left out.
These men should grow a pair...
Ugh, I still dislike any Lego range that feels the need to shed the traditional and iconic Lego character model (I'm looking at you Toy Story)....
Confirm with me that you've kept you daughter sheltered from the outside world (including extended family that might not have been so anti-stereotype that you are) by not leaving the house and cutting off all communications (TV etc) with the outside world. Then I'll believe you that she gravitated to pink all on her…
LOL, ok fair enough. I wasn't that offended....just had too much time on my hands on a slow work day. By the time I got to the end of my post you can tell I'm aware I'm being a bit of a ****.
Considering you called it shallow, when my impression that its lack of depth was entirely intentional, I'm guessing you just didn't get the point of it.
Ok, sorry I'm not wording it better for you seeing as it seems you're the only person here who is not comprehending the proposition of the article- but hey it's very easy to facepalm someone who was actually trying to help you understand the article....*eye-roll*.