watu
watu
watu

"Everyone knows exactly how this game is going to play. It's going to play exactly like Uncharted 2, which played exactly like Uncharted 1."

I agree with the both of you.

I came all geared up to join the debate. (work is boring today)

Like many here I'm a little disappointed that the city choice is going to be a bit "samey" as cities that have gone before....imagine if they'd gone international to a Rio or Tokyo or something....

No, you have your analogy the wrong way round......this sounds like the food is as awesome as expected at this restaurant you went to because of the world famous great chef, and it was the front of house service that let you down .........

Yep, I'll play it because I paid for it, but see you on Wake Island.....and be nice to me if you're on the opposite team:)

I read it as they (DICE) are trying too hard to copy COD SP aspects and that's a bad thing because only COD does COD well......and when I mean "well" I mean I hate COD SP but that's what they do and they do it well....

I'm not having a go at you (just to be clear) but does the guy who wrote this review/article actually say COD has a good SP campaign?

Why constrain yourself with breaking down every game the same way?

I don't get camper hating. In Battlefield if you camp, the only negative is if it's not productive to the team objective, so it only lets yourself and your team down....only people who could be hating people who camp ALL game is their own team squad/team mates.

This marketing ‘game’ EA is playing here is for people who act like sheep when reading reviews and because so many people do act like sheep -for whatever reason, they’re gullible, ignorant or too young and naive- then I have no problem with EA playing ‘the game’.

I'm not stalking you Helis :P, I am posting to agree with you. I'm not happy about the proximity of some of the flags.....I luuurve big maps....

I don't know, maybe attributing it to adrenaline would help you along with that whole suspension of belief thing that everybody needs in at least the smallest of amounts to enjoy most games?

I guess it's personal preference......as someone who doesn't have a lot of online gaming friends, I like how choke-points force teams to act like teams......if there's scope for opposing players to flank you all the time via multiple gaps in the battle front, and your team is just running around the map playing like

Oh I see what you mean. Although it was clearly BETA on Origin for PC, I don't even remember which section of the PlayStation Store I downloaded it from, so if it was in the DEMO section then I take your point and perhaps I'll forgive a few snot nosed kids their confusion.......and I agree that was a less than

Ah, OK then, I didn't realize PC players played so differently from consoles. I played BC2 and Vietnam exclusively on the PS3 and only now have I got a PC powerful enough to play BF3....my BETA experience was mostly on PC and didn't notice players played that much differently than my BC2 and Vietnam experiences or the

I completely disagree. Apart from the Vietcong spawn point on the Vantage Point maps I can't remember a map that was weighted for or against anyone.....sure when my team sucked there were choke points a well organised opposing team could pin you back on for the whole match, but the fight was always pretty even when I

I guess we're all reading into it what we want to then. You see a buggy BETA that isn't testing what you think it should and you think he's talking to people who point this out. I see entitled BETA complainers and I think he's frustrated with them.

I really don't think anything he said was dickish. His response was to people being dickish (the cycle of dickishness?). Ever since BETA hit LOTS of people being flat out BETA-ignorant dicks....

How do you know a modded server when you see one?