waterballoon--disqus
waterballoon
waterballoon--disqus

Ok thanks. It only really catches my eye when they introduce someplace new.

That was my assumption.

His best work was in that terrible John Cena movie. No not that one, the other one.

I thought the opening tinker toy display revealed which areas of the map we'd be visiting, but that wasn't the case tonight, as it went to Astapor, but the show did not. I don't remember that happening before.

Chris Hayes is an incredibly unappealing television personality. At a strictly surface level, he exudes no authority, has never said anything amusing or witty, and tends to get jumpy and over excited.

Lindsay Lohan was a very good host her first time around.

You don't seem to understand people.

The fact that you don't understand why people react emotionally to The death of someone they've spent years reading makes me question your ability to judge his insight. Perhaps you aren't as wise as you think you are.

Yes, I really liked that game. I wish I still had a pc so I could play it. There was something really great about being able to build a death star and actually using it, even though that weakened you in the area.

That's a shame. I loved X-Wing vs. Tie Fighter and Jedi Knight as a kid. I even really liked the now forgotten Star Wars: Rebellion game.

Well yes, that part is obvious.

Because they disagree with him? It's always more interesting to discuss why you disagree with someone than why you agree with him.

I understand the impulse. You end up feeling like you're living in crazy town because no one seems to see the obvious deficiencies in a work that you just dislike at a visceral level. I feel that way about all of Joss Whedon's work.

Not joking. The closest competitors are Morrison and Whedon's stuff, which were interesting in different ways but suffered from massive problems that I could detail if you'd like. Jason Aaron's stuff is total garbage. What else is there? I could never get into X-Statix, and stopped reading Peter David a while ago.

That's him, but he was an established New Mutants character already by that point, created in 1985. Crazy Jane first appeared in 1989.

Edward II comes to mind. Son of Edward "Hammer of the Scots" I, his reign was pretty miserable, ending with him being murdered by having a hot poker thrust up his rectum.

Personally I don't hate joy, but I do hate the trend of zany for the sake of zany storytelling almost as much as the pointlessly grim and nasty stuff.

No, the diehards are right. The show is completely unwatchable now. One of the worst shows on TV. Seasons 3-8 were pretty much perfect. For a few years after that, they put out a couple very good, and a bunch of not-terrible episodes per season.

Carl blames Rick for not killing Andrew when he had the chance. Which is why Carl now believes in not letting enemies live.

Jason Aaron's position about this on twitter reminds me why I don't like Jason Aaron's work on the X-Men. It's odd to see writers of the mutant books who reject the central concepts and premises that separate them from every other generic superhero book.