I don’t know the victim, and would have no way to obtain the facts that you’re looking for. But the fact that there is a victim should be sufficient.

Why she stole her identity is irrelevant. If you steal bread to feed your family, you still stole the bread.

That references the costs associated with legal assistance in restoring your identity.

Sticking up for convicted felons, i.e. the Democratic base. (And yes, I’m aware that felons can not vote, spare me).

Should I be punished for breaking the law, or kicked out? I’m a citizen, so no, I can not be “kicked out”. If I use public wifi to create a fake profile and bully some insecure teenage girl to the point the she commits suicide, then yeah, lock me up.

A felony? Ok Dr.

“Indirect financial loss includes any outside costs associated with identity theft, like legal fees or overdraft charges. The DOJ’s study found that victims experienced a combined average loss of $1,343. In total, identity theft victims lost a whopping $15.4 billion in 2014.”

Where is the evidence she was a net contributor and not a net taker? She could have used that SSN to receive a tax rebate, and any number of additional government benefits. Not saying she did, or didn’t, but you can’t just claim that she was a contributing member of society unless you know something I don’t. I…

How about empathy for the woman whose identity was stolen? “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

How about empathy for the woman whose identity was stolen? “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

How about empathy for the woman whose identity was stolen? “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

No, she stole a real number. “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

Imagine having your identity stolen. “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

How about empathy for the woman whose identity was stolen? “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”.

How about empathy for the woman whose identity was stolen? “The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is code for “felony identity theft”. 

“The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment”. This is actually code for “felony identity theft”. Not exactly a “minor infraction”.

“The New York Times reports that Rayos, who was convicted in 2008 of using a false social security number to obtain employment” This sure sounds a lot softer than “felony identity theft”. Good job Ellie! Way to spin!

They willfully sold their possessions and donated the proceeds. They did not have their possessions confiscated by Caesar and redistributed.

Scoreboard since 1994 (NOT EVEN INCLUDING WTC1): White Extremists - 231. Islamic Extremists - 3000+. Yep, David Duke is the threat (no support for David Duke, just saying they’re a toothless animal by comparison).

Bwahahaahhaahahahahahahaahhaahhahahahahaha