warrend
Warren'd
warrend

So. You're relying on a simplified high-school definition of evolution, while simultaneously claiming to refute the logic of those who have actually studied it and advanced the field. From where do you get your information on probability and the nature of mutation? You seem to be ignoring the enormity of geological

I think it's the public nature of the complaints that's most irritating. Simultaneously announcing a windfall, while bemoaning your benefactor without a shred of embarrassment. What we really need is more guns.

Attention: this is indeed satire:

Yes, I think you're right.

Thanks, very much. :)

I appreciated your thoughtful reply, but I had intended this as satire; specifically relating to an io9 piece published earlier this year. I suppose you could consider it a poe.

Yes, our Lord Satan commands that His acolytes be scientifically literate. His ultimate plan is to rid the world of ignorance and stupidity in order that a paradise be created on earth. We will one day overthrow Elohim and rule the heavens themselves. Mwha haha.

Pure satire. In reference to another article featured by io9 critical of smug atheism.

I hope you realize this is satire in reference to another io9 article.

The more I tried to make it appear an obvious parody, the more it appeared to be the genuine article. It really is an uncanny process.

Yes, it is. Based on a io9 article critical of atheism.

Why Smug Evolutionists Should Read More Science Fiction

I think this is a bit misleading, and the potential implications born out have not been explored in the comments. For instance: Is an entire universe being simulated? From inception, to heat death? Is it being deliberately fine tuned with life, or specifically us in mind? Is the focus us the study cosmological

Yes, we called it Auschwitz.

Nothing says 'I love you' quite like directing coherent comprehension waves at what remains of grandma in a 30,000 dollar wood-grained iDied-player.

So. You decimated my coffee. Thanks for that.

Damn dude.

I appreciate your nuanced approach. The fact is, 'Atheist' tends to be too broad a descriptor to encompass the diversity of thought within this group.

No no no no. Behaving like them would involve making unsupported claims about the nature of the universe and its supposed creator, whilst simultaneously decreeing verisimilitude in moral and legal issues effecting everyone. Atheists generally base their 'beliefs' on things that exist in this life, this world, and with

Ha! Mine are 7 and 11, and I still occasionally check.