That's not confusion, that's insanity. No sane person expects all regular women to look like super models.

I've always wondered the same thing.

Apart from such a suggestion being simply asinine, how exactly would such censorship be done? By what mechanism would the numbers 6 and 2 be prevented from being used in sequence?

Makes sense.

Is anyone else disappointed that the soundtrack was that crap music and not the sound of the truck?

Photoshopping may well be the desired object of ridicule, but criticizing the appearance of this woman's body is not really the best way to go about it.

"Not one word of this piece said anything was wrong with her body. "

No I am not as thin as she, are you? I'm mostly interested in the opinions and thoughts of Jezebel's staff and readers. They seem (generally) to be against body shaming, but at the same time very quick to criticize he bodies of certain types of people. Your justification of such criticism is interesting, though not at…

Of course she's not being shamed simply by virtue of her pic being the topic of the article. She's being body shamed by virtue of people calling her appearance "unnatural" and "strange."

Wrong, there is judgement if that is the unedited shot. It's already published on Jezebel, and it fills the comment section. It does not cease to exist based on whether or not the woman's waist is edited in this shot. Also, the picture is clearly not "perfectly good" to some people. You yourself are saying that it…

Why do you (and the author) assume this is not her natural appearance? Have you not seen the untouched pic LOFT has provided Jezebel?

If you can't see that comments about the woman having a "run-in with that waist-eating monster", or how she used to be fully formed are criticisms of her appearance, then I can't help you. I understand the author's intent, but the method of criticizing this woman's look is honestly kind of gross.

Check the title for the "disaster" part.

The article is labeling this woman's appearance a "disaster", and assuming that it's the fault of some photo editor. You can dodge that fact, and justify it any way you choose, but the fact remains. I'm not worried abut the feelings of this model, or about anyone's preference for extremely thin women (I have no such…

So it's not criticism about her body because people have an issue with her body, but rather it's criticism about her body because some people have an issue with other people's perception of beauty. Is that supposed to be any better?

Why is Jezebel so quick to constantly accuse women's bodies of being unnatural or in some way wrong?

"I'm sorry but this is one of the best justification of a cop shooting an elder lady."

"If one is easily scared by a view down a barrel, one simply shouldn't consider career in police."

"what is the evidence to back up this scientific claim that you need special shoes in order to do something that your species has been superb at for two million years?"

At that level, a good amount of energy goes into riding. Between keeping your body in the best position, and giving the animal the proper input, it's not exactly easy.

Owners don't look for super-light people because super-light people are great at running a horse, they look for super-light people because they're…