I don’t think its that simple either way. It’s a he said/she said thing. A jury, who heard all the evidence, believed him over her. At what point can we assume that nothing bad happened? Or you one of those people who thinks anytime this is brought up, it must be true. If he had been having sex with her for…

Ok, I don’t see how he treated her like trash. There are plenty of people in this country who consent to group sex all the time. There are plenty of people who engage in a purely sexual relationship. There are plenty of women who get gifts for those sexual relationships. She seemed to be fine until she realized he…

I actually agree here. This reported the “facts” but clearly with a slant. I’ll admit, it wasn’t a ton of editorializing. But certain articles seemed to be trying to be factual, yet paint Rose as a bad guy. Bringing up the fact that he took condoms. Bringing up that he said their relationship was purely sexual…