If you don’t understand that comment you can’t have this debate. But to make it less witty for you - not paying taxes because you’re a criminal is not the same as not paying taxes because none are owed under the law

So you’re accusing Trump of crimes. If that turns out to be true he should either not become president or he should be brought to justice even while president. Period. But not paying taxes is not the same as not paying taxes.

This is the most tenuous gadget news you’ve ever attempted. The hacker used a computer so.....TO GIZMODO WE GO!

? The tax returns show his legal fair share, which may be zero. But he told you his income, $694 million. How much of that does he owe?

Thanks for raising the level of discourse

So, again, what’s the number? What number should Trump gift to the government as charity in the hopes that it saves a starving kid? Give me a number. The was a retort of “less than zero” so, $1? $10 million? $300 million?

I want to recall the one-sided coverage of tonight’s debate next time anyone in your “writers” union wants to claim journalist privilege over whatever topic you get pissy about. If you want to be the next gawker and a one-sided rag, that’s perfectly fine, there’s many of those advocating for all political leanings. …

Ok. So you can become a politician and change the laws. Do you pay more taxes than you owe? Because you’re advocating that he voluntarily pays taxes he doesn’t owe because he’s rich.

Yeah. That’s why the did it. Because he’s black. Not because of the legitimate possibility it could have been true given his life story. You’re forgetting something about the birther situation which is that it asked a simple question - where were you born? Guy that wants to be president says “america” - and then…

So what is his fair share? If there’s no law demanding a certain amount of taxes from him - what should he pay? Whatever number you make up as sounding fair?

Sure sounds like you don’t understand tax law. If he didn’t pay taxes he owes - that’s one thing. If he doesn’t pay taxes because they’re not owed - you’re advocating socialism. You’re advocating that a private citizen voluntarily pays taxes he does not owe just because he has more money than other people

Tell me sincerely - would you choose to float around in shit or would you choose to hold every life on the face of the earth in your hands every moment of every day? We lose touch with what the job of President is in the politics and in the (thankful) relative peace we’ve enjoyed for a long time. But every single…

Yeah, but what’s his WAR?

You seemingly cannot have a discussion from any neutral perspective.

This is the level of discourse I’d expect from you, Jordan. If it lasted a second or an hour - the critical part of the photo is a former leader of the free world making that expression of affection towards another human being, and a woman of strength accepting it.

This might be the least effective defense of Hillary I’ve ever seen. Let me summarize what you just said:

A room full of soccer moms is not the same stage as the debate that 100 million+ people are watching. It’s like the airplane principle of turning off devices. Absolutely nothing is probably going to happen but there’s zero upside in allowing anyone to just use whatever signal transmitting device they want. Even if…

LOL you’re technically correct, the best kind of correct. She did indeed want to keep things secret from the government she served and the people she represents. That is true.

I think it’s more along the lines of

1. I’m more than positive national security concerns about bringing outside signal connectivity when both candidates are right in front of you would trump any application of FCC laws designed to help consumers from not paying $50 a bucks for internet