What about people whose children have all disowned them? 

Evangelical Christians looking forward to the apocalypse should jump to the head of the line.  Or off a fucking cliff.

Elon Musk is a dumb bitch with a breeding kink so of course he thinks this.

This semi-sentient poop emoji is unsurprising in vomiting up such a stinking shitsnake of an opinion.

Here’s your daily reminder that Ron DeSantis regularly hung out with his underage high school students at parties and drank alcohol with them, but loves to accuse any and every other person of “child grooming” - another case of deflection and hypocrisy 

“Who are you trying to make better off? And what public policy problems do you get up in the morning thinking about how to solve?”

Once again, Buttigieg proving that he’s a true statesman, and the GQP is a flaming clown car show. That DeSantis ad is very weird. 

“Who are you trying to help? Who are you trying to make better off? And what public policy problems do you get up in the morning thinking about how to solve?”

I went in with low expectations, but goddamn wtf was that video

Religion is a plague on humanity. Always has been, always will be.

Well. I expect Jewish and Muslim and Buddha run businesses to now deny service to any Christians on the basis of their religion.

The conservative justices are so far up their donors asses that they aren’t even bothering to try and be “just” any longer.

Not to give Mulvaney a hard time; I like her (as much as I can like anyone who calls herself an “influencer”, anyway). But expecting any corporation to behave morally and decently when it might impact profits is pretty risky, and expecting a public corporation to do so is utter fantasy. Boards of directors have only…

Super weird how all the right-wingers screaming about “aCtIvIsT jUdGeS” a couple years ago have all shut the fuck up, huh?

I really hope something sticks.  Too many people getting away with this.  Truth to power only works if they’re ultimately held accountable.

So start denying service to christians because you don’t agree with their lifestyle.

I repeat: I hope everyone understands the assignment going forward with this shit.

VOTE!

The whole premise of the case is BS. Religious freedom to discriminate is NOT in the constitution, unless you are a not-for-profit religious organization. (See Catholics an no women priests.)

“The result here is that the Court substitutes itself for Congress and the Executive Branch in making national policy about student-loan forgiveness.”

Except is is relevant, because Smith hasn’t suffered damages. No damages, no standing to sue.

Whaaaaa... a white Christian perpetual victim is making a completely made up bad faith argument?!?  I just don’t believe it...