Heaven forbid that people actually have to make their own decisions on what curators are for them and not, we need reviewers of the reviewers to let us know their views come pre-approved.

This is going to be Mass Effect all over again. The SILENT MAJORITY will like Jacob and the Kotaku commenters will like Evie and get annoyed with the people who use Jacob.

Well it is a business, ya know. It’s a fair trade off for the map packs being free for everybody in my book. Added in with all the other stuff they’re adding free of charge, I don’t see the issue with it. There’s no incentive/advantage to spend money, nor do they force us. And the people who do, ultimately aid the…

I love hearing from people who say they were disappointed with a game that they went out of their way to get 100% on.

I had a bad burger from Fuddruckers one time.

0.66%, actually.

GG vs AGG is a really nasty fight. Both have some pretty nasty people at their head. But truth be told I’d be more scared of being the target of agg’s ire than GGs.

For not anyone caring about gamergate it sure seems to get brought up a lot! It even shows up in unrelated articles because name dropping gamer gate boosts traffic.

Congratulations on entirely misreading that report.

True but both panels were appearing to be thinly veiled GG stuff. Also both sides have been harassing each other. I frequently get labelled as sexist or somehow pro-online harassment just because I don’t agree with a movement that has people like Sarkeesian as their idols, which in itself would be called harassment or…

One does not have an informed view when they ignore sources and facts, especially the committee that more or less sets the standards for journalistic ethics. That would instead make you a troll, and a fairly bad one at that.