So Warners can give us two DC heroes headlining separate movies AND TV Shows, but if it’s a recurring villain, they only want ONE version?
My Chromebook fits ~95% of my needs, with the extra 5% being occasional gaming or photo editing. Everything else is either done on a Chromebook, or a Chrome-OS compatible program like Google Docs (the ergonomics is better on my desktop).
I bet when you talk to a woman you call her m’lady.
So where exactly on the spectrum do you fall?
Well years ago it was the literal plot of a Justice League Unlimited Episode where Terry finds out Amanda Waller cloned Bruce Wayne to create Terry so there always would be a Batman.
Oh God, why did you brought this shit up? Now you’ve made it even more ridiculous and complicated! ;)
Batman Returns did give us this nice little moment:
This is a fun read. My only real comment I feel compelled to make is that DC officially became a part of Warner Brothers in 1972 - so they were already a company that COULD make their own stories into movies without fighting a studio for creative rights for decades before Marvel ever could. Even though Tim Burton was…
And the end credits scene? We find out the entire 10 year MCU was a Tide ad.
It was inside us all along.
Honestly Luke and Leia being Vader’s kids fucked up the timeline completely. I mean Yoda was some ancient space wizard who lived to be 900. Totally plausible Obi-Wan was crazy old too, and Darth Vader as well by extension.
Keep this in mind: How many people actually know the story of Padme Amidala and Anakin Skywalker?
Right? And somehow Rey knew the Falcon was the ship that did the Kessel run in however many Parsecs. Ugh.
It’s salt, dammit! It’s not snow, it’s a completely new thing we’ve never seen before!
Luke and Han were a relatively minor figures in the actual history of the galaxy, as far as anyone knows. Like, sure, they fired the shots that blew up the Death Stars, but we don’t know the names of even the most notable pilots in our own wars going on in real life right now. People (even historians) are far more…
Y’all motherfuckers can accept Gravity, an entire movie based around this concept that’s supposed to take place in our universe with our physics, but can’t accept that Leia can use the force to move like 20 feet in zero-G.
I need more opinions on sand.
The new movies acknowledge the prequels. Kylo Ren mentions a clone army in the first one and Luke briefly recounts the rise of Darth Sidious in the new one. There’s not a lot of reason to dwell on those events 50something years later, honestly.
The best thing about the current Star Wars comics is that they actively embrace the prequels. The worst thing about the current Star Wars movies is that they actively brush away the prequels.