At least the truck stood its ground...
At least the truck stood its ground...
More like a piston-engined airplane than a car, haha.
Came here for pictures of trunk being open, realised fast back doesn’t mean hatchback, left disappointed and confused.
I honestly had been assuming lately that modern car-based crossovers were essentially immune to rolling over like their truck-based forebears. I mean, they’re basically cars in most ways. I figured they had solved those handling issues.
OUR FLYING CARS! If those doors could flap fast enough ...
No jalop spec 528i manual with sport suspension, pleather, sunroof delete?
Thats true, I do feel the 170 HP engine will be quite sufficient for the majority of people. I just think a performance variant could inspire more passion in the model as a whole, while satisfying the enthusiast minority as well.
Can’t wait to hear all about what the driver did wrong, how much better of a driver other posters are, and how they would have handled it so much better.
Strange angle for a story. You’ve seemingly purposely glossed over the reality that a “typical car buyer” wouldn’t be in a VW showroom in the first place. “Typical car buyers” don’t care about intangibles like driving enjoyment and nicer-than-they-ought-to-be interiors, which is a thing that you pay a premium for with…
I’m one of those dozen or so weirdos! I’ll likely snag one of these in S or SE trim with a manual sometime in 2017.
<But the dozen or so weirdos that want a lifted Golf wagon with a stick>
I for one welcome our new conspicuously hidden wagon overlords.
I’m gonna guess they cite the driver of the Camry.
The issue here is that he was trying to drive a Camaro while wearing a shirt with sleeves.